Suppr超能文献

去玷污层剂是否会影响基于硅酸钙的根管封闭剂的推出强度?

Do smear-layer removal agents affect the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers?

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Grande Rio University (UNIGRANRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2017 Jun;50(6):612-619. doi: 10.1111/iej.12662. Epub 2016 Jun 14.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the effect of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 2.25% peracetic acid (PA) or 10% citric acid (CA) on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers [MTA Fillapex (Angelus, Londrina, Brazil) and Total Fill BC Sealer (FKG, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland)] to root dentine after different periods of immersion in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). AH Plus (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstaz, Germany) was used as a reference material for comparison.

METHODOLOGY

Thirty human maxillary incisors were selected and three 1-mm discs were obtained from the middle third of each root. On the axial surface of each disc, three 0.8-mm-diameter holes were drilled through the dentine. After standardized irrigation, each dentine disc from the same root was treated for smear-layer removal with one of the three tested chelating solutions: EDTA, PA or CA. After that, the holes were dried with paper points and filled with one of the three test root canal sealers. The filled dental slices were further immersed in PBS solution (pH 7.2) for 7 days (T1) or 30 days (T2) at 37 °C, before the push-out assay. Friedman, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used respectively to estimate the impact of the independent variables (solutions, sealers and period of PBS immersion) on the push-out bond strength. The level for significance was set at α = 5% and data were further subjected to a Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

Solutions and periods of immersion did not significantly influence the displacement resistance (P = 0.285, and P = 0.104, respectively) of sealers to root dentine. On the other hand, the type of sealer significantly affected the push-out bond strength (P = 0.000). AH Plus was associated with greater resistance to dislodgment compared with Total Fill BC Sealer and MTA Fillapex (P = 0.000). MTA Fillapex resulted in the lowest push-out bond strength (P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

The use of different chelating agents did not influence the push-out bond strength of endodontic sealers. Calcium silicate-based sealers had lower push-out bond strength values compared with a conventional epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus).

摘要

目的

评估 17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)、2.25%过氧乙酸(PA)或 10%柠檬酸(CA)在不同磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)浸泡时间后对钙硅酸钠基根管封闭剂[MTA Fillapex(Angelus,Londrina,巴西)和 Total Fill BC 密封剂(FKG,La Chaux-de-Fonds,瑞士)]与根管牙本质的推出粘结强度的影响。AH Plus(Dentsply DeTrey,Konstaz,德国)被用作比较的参考材料。

方法

选择 30 个人上颌中切牙,从每个牙根的中间三分之一获得三个 1-mm 圆盘。在每个圆盘的轴面,通过牙本质钻三个 0.8-mm 直径的孔。在标准化冲洗后,用三种测试螯合剂溶液之一处理同一根的每个牙本质圆盘以去除玷污层:EDTA、PA 或 CA。之后,用纸质点吸干孔并用三种测试根管封闭剂之一填充。填充的牙切片在 37°C 下进一步浸入 PBS 溶液(pH 7.2)中 7 天(T1)或 30 天(T2),然后进行推出试验。分别使用 Friedman、Kruskal-Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney 检验来估计独立变量(溶液、密封剂和 PBS 浸泡时间)对推出粘结强度的影响。显著性水平设为α=0.05,数据进一步进行 Bonferroni 校正。

结果

溶液和浸泡时间均未显著影响密封剂对根管牙本质的位移阻力(P=0.285 和 P=0.104,分别)。另一方面,密封剂的类型显著影响推出粘结强度(P=0.000)。与 Total Fill BC 密封剂和 MTA Fillapex 相比,AH Plus 与更大的抗脱位阻力相关(P=0.000)。MTA Fillapex 导致最低的推出粘结强度(P=0.000)。

结论

使用不同的螯合剂不会影响根管封闭剂的推出粘结强度。与传统的环氧树脂基封闭剂(AH Plus)相比,钙硅酸钠基封闭剂的推出粘结强度值较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验