Gjerberg Elisabeth, Lillemoen Lillian, Førde Reidun, Pedersen Reidar
Centre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, P.b 1130 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway.
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Aug 19;15:103. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0096-y.
Involving nursing home patients and their relatives in end-of-life care conversations and treatment decisions has recently gained increased importance in several Western countries. However, there is little knowledge about how the patients themselves and their next-of-kin look upon involvement in end-of-life care decisions. The purpose of this paper is to explore nursing home patients' and next-of-kin's experiences with- and perspectives on end-of-life care conversations, information and shared decision-making.
The study has a qualitative and explorative design, based on a combination of individual interviews with 35 patients living in six nursing homes and seven focus group interviews with 33 relatives. The data was analysed applying a "bricolage" approach". Participation was based on informed consent, and the study was approved by the Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics.
Few patients and relatives had participated in conversations about end-of-life care. Most relatives wanted such conversations, while the patients' opinions varied. With some exceptions, patients and relatives wanted to be informed about the patient's health condition. The majority wanted to be involved in the decision-making process, but leave the final decisions to the health professionals. Among the patients, the opinion varied; some patients wanted to leave the decisions more or less completely to the nursing home staff. Conversations about end-of-life care issues are emotionally challenging, and very few patients had discussed these questions with their family. The relatives' opinions of the patient's preferences were mainly based on assumptions; they had seldom talked about this explicitly. Both patients and relatives wanted the staff to raise these questions.
Nursing home staff should initiate conversations about preferences for end-of-life care, assisting patients and relatives in talking about these issues, while at the same time being sensitive to the diversity in opinions and the timing for such conversations. As the popularity of advance care planning increases in many Western countries, discussions of patients' and relatives' perspectives will be of great interest to a broader audience.
在一些西方国家,让养老院患者及其亲属参与临终关怀谈话和治疗决策最近变得越来越重要。然而,对于患者本人及其近亲如何看待参与临终关怀决策,我们知之甚少。本文的目的是探讨养老院患者及其近亲在临终关怀谈话、信息提供和共同决策方面的经历及观点。
本研究采用定性和探索性设计,结合对居住在六家养老院的35名患者进行的个人访谈以及对33名亲属进行的七次焦点小组访谈。数据采用“拼贴法”进行分析。参与基于知情同意,该研究获得了地区医学与健康研究伦理委员会的批准。
很少有患者和亲属参与过关于临终关怀的谈话。大多数亲属希望进行此类谈话,而患者的意见各不相同。除了一些例外情况,患者和亲属希望了解患者的健康状况。大多数人希望参与决策过程,但将最终决定权留给医疗专业人员。在患者中,意见各不相同;一些患者希望或多或少完全将决策权留给养老院工作人员。关于临终关怀问题的谈话在情感上具有挑战性,很少有患者与家人讨论过这些问题。亲属对患者偏好的看法主要基于假设;他们很少明确谈论过这一点。患者和亲属都希望工作人员提出这些问题。
养老院工作人员应发起关于临终关怀偏好的谈话,协助患者和亲属谈论这些问题,同时要对意见的多样性和谈话时机保持敏感。随着预立医疗照护计划在许多西方国家的普及,对患者和亲属观点的讨论会引起更广泛受众的极大兴趣。