Pizer Steven D
150 South Huntington Avenue (Mail Stop 152H), Boston, MA, 02130.
Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr;51(2):790-811. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12355. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
To demonstrate how falsification tests can be used to evaluate instrumental variables methods applicable to a wide variety of comparative effectiveness research questions.
Brief conceptual review of instrumental variables and falsification testing principles and techniques accompanied by an empirical application. Sample STATA code related to the empirical application is provided in the Appendix.
Comparative long-term risks of sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones for management of type 2 diabetes. Outcomes include mortality and hospitalization for an ambulatory care-sensitive condition. Prescribing pattern variations are used as instrumental variables.
Falsification testing is an easily computed and powerful way to evaluate the validity of the key assumption underlying instrumental variables analysis. If falsification tests are used, instrumental variables techniques can help answer a multitude of important clinical questions.
证明如何使用证伪检验来评估适用于各种比较效果研究问题的工具变量方法。
对工具变量和证伪检验原理及技术进行简要概念性回顾,并辅以实证应用。附录中提供了与实证应用相关的示例STATA代码。
磺脲类药物和噻唑烷二酮类药物治疗2型糖尿病的长期风险比较。结局包括因非卧床护理敏感疾病导致的死亡率和住院率。处方模式变化用作工具变量。
证伪检验是一种易于计算且强大的方法,可用于评估工具变量分析所依据的关键假设的有效性。如果使用证伪检验,工具变量技术可以帮助回答众多重要的临床问题。