Forsell Joakim, Koskiniemi Satu, Hedberg Ida, Edebro Helén, Evengård Birgitta, Granlund Margareta
Division of Clinical Bacteriology, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Division of Infectious diseases, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
J Med Microbiol. 2015 Sep;64(9):1053-1062. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000129. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
Although PCR offers the potential for sensitive detection of parasites there are several pitfalls for optimal performance, especially when DNA is extracted from a complex sample material such as stool. With the aid of a sensitive inhibitor control in a duplex real-time PCR (qPCR) for identification of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar we have evaluated factors that influenced the performance of the qPCR and have suggested a rationale to be used in the analysis of clinical samples. Pre-PCR processing was found to be of outmost importance for an optimal amplification since inhibitors caused false-negative results when higher amounts of sample were used. Stool sampling with a flocked swab (ESwab, Copan), yielding on average 173 mg, gave positive qPCR results in samples with cysts of E. dispar that were negative in serially diluted stool samples. The degree of inhibition found varied between samples and was not an on-off phenomenon. Even low-grade inhibition, shown as an increase of two cycles in the qPCR for the inhibitor control, could lead to false negativity in samples with low amounts of parasites. Lack of amplification in the qPCR due to inhibition could be overcome by dilution of the extracted DNA by 1/10-1/20. We also describe the use of guanidinium thiocyanate buffer for transport and storage of samples as well as a time-saving semi-automated DNA extraction method in an Arrow instrument (Nordiag) preceded by bead beating.
尽管聚合酶链反应(PCR)为寄生虫的灵敏检测提供了可能,但要实现最佳性能仍存在一些陷阱,尤其是从粪便等复杂样本材料中提取DNA时。借助用于鉴别溶组织内阿米巴和迪斯帕内阿米巴的双重实时PCR(qPCR)中的灵敏抑制剂对照,我们评估了影响qPCR性能的因素,并提出了用于临床样本分析的基本原理。发现PCR前处理对于实现最佳扩增至关重要,因为当使用较多量样本时,抑制剂会导致假阴性结果。使用植绒拭子(ESwab,科盼公司)采集粪便样本,平均可采集到173毫克,在含有迪斯帕内阿米巴包囊的样本中获得了阳性qPCR结果,而这些样本在系列稀释的粪便样本中呈阴性。发现的抑制程度因样本而异,并非是一种非此即彼的现象。即使是低水平抑制,在抑制剂对照的qPCR中表现为两个循环的增加,也可能导致寄生虫数量少的样本出现假阴性。因抑制导致qPCR中缺乏扩增可通过将提取的DNA稀释1/10 - 1/20来克服。我们还描述了使用硫氰酸胍缓冲液运输和储存样本,以及在珠磨处理后使用Arrow仪器(北欧诊断公司)进行省时的半自动DNA提取方法。