Zhu Shichao, Cai Lin, Ma Chunhua, Zeng Hongmei, Guo Hua, Mao Xiaoqing, Zeng Chenghui, Li Xiaohong, Zhao Hua, Liu Yongfang, Liu Shilian, Sun Juhua, Zhang Ling, Peng Tingyong, Dong Mina, Chen Liping, Zong Zhiyong
1Department of Infection Control,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu,China.
2Intensive Care Unit,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu,China.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;36(12):1388-95. doi: 10.1017/ice.2015.200. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has developed an approach to ventilator-associated events (VAE) surveillance. Using these methods, this study was performed to investigate VAE incidences and to test whether VAEs are associated with poorer outcomes in China.
A 4-month, prospective multicenter surveillance study between April and July 2013.
Our study included 15 adult intensive care units (ICUs) of 15 hospitals in China.
Patients admitted to ICUs during the study period
Patients on mechanical ventilation (MV) were monitored for VAEs: ventilator-associated conditions (VACs), infection-related ventilator-associated complications (IVACs), and possible or probable ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Patients with and without VACs were compared with regard to duration of MV, ICU length of stay (LOS), overall hospital LOS, and mortality rate.
During the study period, 2,356 of the 5,256 patients admitted to ICUs received MV for 8,438 ventilator days. Of these patients, 636 were on MV >2 days. VACs were identified in 94 cases (4.0%; 11.1 cases per 1,000 ventilator days), including 31 patients with IVACs and 16 with possible VAP but none with probable VAP. Compared with patients without VACs, patients with VACs had longer ICU LOS (by 6.2 days), longer duration on MV (by 7.7 days), and higher hospital mortality rate (50.0% vs 27.3%). The mortality rate attributable to VACs was 11.7%. Compared with those with VACs alone, patients with IVACs had longer duration on MV and increased ICU LOS but no higher mortality rates.
In China, surveillance of VACs and IVACs is able to identify MV patients with poorer outcomes. However, surveillance of possible and probable VAP can be problematic.
美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)已制定了一种呼吸机相关事件(VAE)监测方法。本研究采用这些方法,旨在调查中国VAE的发生率,并检验VAE是否与更差的预后相关。
2013年4月至7月期间进行的一项为期4个月的前瞻性多中心监测研究。
我们的研究纳入了中国15家医院的15个成人重症监护病房(ICU)。
研究期间入住ICU的患者
对接受机械通气(MV)的患者进行VAE监测:呼吸机相关状况(VAC)、感染相关呼吸机相关并发症(IVAC)以及可能或疑似呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)。比较发生和未发生VAC的患者在MV持续时间、ICU住院时间(LOS)、医院总住院时间和死亡率方面的差异。
在研究期间,5256例入住ICU的患者中有2356例接受了MV,累计呼吸机使用天数为8438天。其中,636例患者的MV时间>2天。共识别出94例VAC(4.0%;每1000呼吸机日11.1例),包括31例IVAC患者和16例可能的VAP患者,但无确诊的VAP患者。与未发生VAC的患者相比,发生VAC的患者ICU住院时间更长(长6.2天),MV持续时间更长(长7.7天),医院死亡率更高(50.0%对27.3%)。VAC导致的死亡率为11.7%。与仅发生VAC的患者相比,IVAC患者的MV持续时间更长,ICU住院时间增加,但死亡率没有更高。
在中国,对VAC和IVAC的监测能够识别出预后较差的MV患者。然而,对可能和疑似VAP的监测可能存在问题。