Keshen Corrine, Cohen Jerome
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, N9B 3P4, Canada.
Early Childhood Multidisciplinary Intervention, 699 Eglinton Avenue West #202, Toronto, ON, M5N 1C6, Canada.
Anim Cogn. 2016 Jan;19(1):91-107. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0915-8. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
After being trained to find a previous missing object within an array of four different objects, rats received occasional probe trials with such test arrays rotated from that of their respective three-object study arrays. Only animals exposed to each object's non-spatial features consistently paired with both its spatial features (feeder's relative orientation and direction) in the first experiment or with only feeder's relative orientation in the second experiment (Fixed Configuration groups) were adversely affected by probe trial test array rotations. This effect, however, was less persistent for this group in the second experiment but re-emerged when objects' non-spatial features were later rendered uninformative. Animals that had both types of each object's features randomly paired over trials but not between a trial's study and test array (Varied Configuration groups) were not adversely affected on probe trials but improved their missing-object recognition in the first experiment. These findings suggest that the Fixed Configuration groups had integrated each object's non-spatial with both (in Experiment 1) or one (in Experiment 2) of its spatial features to construct a single representation that they could not easily compare to any object in a rotated probe test array. The Varied Configuration groups must maintain separate representations of each object's features to solve this task. This prevented them from exhibiting such adverse effects on rotated probe trial test arrays but enhanced the rats' missing-object recognition in the first experiment. We discussed how rats' flexible use (retrieval) of encoded information from their visuospatial working memory corresponds to that of humans' visuospatial memory in object change detection and complex object recognition tasks. We also discussed how foraging-specific factors may have influenced each group's performance in this task.
在经过训练以在包含四个不同物体的阵列中找到先前丢失的物体后,大鼠会偶尔接受探测试验,试验中的测试阵列相对于它们各自的三个物体的学习阵列进行了旋转。只有在第一个实验中,每个物体的非空间特征始终与其空间特征(喂食器的相对方向和方向)配对,或者在第二个实验中仅与喂食器的相对方向配对的动物(固定配置组),会受到探测试验测试阵列旋转的不利影响。然而,在第二个实验中,该组的这种影响持续时间较短,但当物体的非空间特征后来变得无信息价值时,这种影响又重新出现。在试验中每个物体的两种特征随机配对,但在一次试验的学习阵列和测试阵列之间不配对的动物(变化配置组),在探测试验中没有受到不利影响,反而在第一个实验中提高了它们对丢失物体的识别能力。这些发现表明,固定配置组已经将每个物体的非空间特征与它的两种(在实验1中)或一种(在实验2中)空间特征整合起来,构建了一个单一的表征,在旋转的探测测试阵列中,它们无法轻易地将其与任何物体进行比较。变化配置组必须保持每个物体特征的单独表征来解决这个任务。这使它们在旋转的探测试验测试阵列中不会表现出这种不利影响,但在第一个实验中增强了大鼠对丢失物体的识别能力。我们讨论了大鼠如何灵活地(检索)利用其视觉空间工作记忆中编码的信息,这与人类在物体变化检测和复杂物体识别任务中的视觉空间记忆相对应。我们还讨论了觅食特定因素可能如何影响了每组在这项任务中的表现。