• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与其他商业化一次性胰岛素笔相比,Gla-300注射装置的准确性和注射力

Accuracy and Injection Force of the Gla-300 Injection Device Compared With Other Commercialized Disposable Insulin Pens.

作者信息

Klonoff David, Nayberg Irina, Thonius Marissa, See Florian, Abdel-Tawab Mona, Erbstein Frank, Haak Thomas

机构信息

Diabetes Research Institute, Mills-Peninsula Health Services, San Mateo, CA, USA

Diabetes Research Institute, Mills-Peninsula Health Services, San Mateo, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Aug 26;10(1):125-30. doi: 10.1177/1932296815601441.

DOI:10.1177/1932296815601441
PMID:26311720
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4738217/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To deliver insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300), the widely used SoloSTAR(®) pen has been modified to allow for accurate and precise delivery of required insulin units in one-third of the volume compared with insulin glargine 100 U/mL, while improving usability. Here we compare the accuracy and injection force of 3 disposable insulin pens: Gla-300 SoloSTAR(®), FlexPen(®), and KwikPen™.

METHODS

For the accuracy assessment, 60 of each of the 3 tested devices were used for the delivery of 3 different doses (1 U, half-maximal dose, and maximal dose), which were measured gravimetrically. For the injection force assessment, 20 pens of each of the 3 types were tested twice at half-maximal and once at maximal dose, at an injection speed of 6 U/s.

RESULTS

All tested pens met the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) requirements for dosing accuracy, with Gla-300 SoloSTAR showing the lowest between-dose variation (greatest reproducibility) at all dose levels. Mean injection force was significantly lower for Gla-300 SoloSTAR than for the other 2 pens at both half maximal and maximal doses (P < .0271).

CONCLUSION

All tested pens were accurate according to ISO criteria, and the Gla-300 SoloSTAR pen displayed the greatest reproducibility and lowest injection force of any of the 3 tested devices.

摘要

背景

为了注射甘精胰岛素300 U/mL(Gla-300),广泛使用的优伴笔(SoloSTAR®)已进行了改进,与100 U/mL的甘精胰岛素相比,能够以三分之一的体积精确递送所需的胰岛素单位,同时提高了易用性。在此,我们比较了3种一次性胰岛素笔的准确性和注射力:Gla-300优伴笔(SoloSTAR®)、诺和笔(FlexPen®)和快易笔(KwikPen™)。

方法

在准确性评估中,3种受试装置各60支用于递送3种不同剂量(1 U、半最大剂量和最大剂量),通过重量法进行测量。在注射力评估中,3种类型的胰岛素笔各20支在半最大剂量下测试两次,在最大剂量下测试一次,注射速度为6 U/s。

结果

所有受试笔均符合国际标准化组织(ISO)的给药准确性要求,Gla-300优伴笔在所有剂量水平下的剂量间差异最低(再现性最高)。在半最大剂量和最大剂量下,Gla-300优伴笔的平均注射力均显著低于其他2种笔(P < 0.0271)。

结论

根据ISO标准,所有受试笔均准确,且Gla-300优伴笔在3种受试装置中显示出最高的再现性和最低的注射力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e23c/4738217/83b7b503979f/10.1177_1932296815601441-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e23c/4738217/ba71edb51e8b/10.1177_1932296815601441-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e23c/4738217/791c61f6ea19/10.1177_1932296815601441-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e23c/4738217/83b7b503979f/10.1177_1932296815601441-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e23c/4738217/ba71edb51e8b/10.1177_1932296815601441-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e23c/4738217/791c61f6ea19/10.1177_1932296815601441-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e23c/4738217/83b7b503979f/10.1177_1932296815601441-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Accuracy and Injection Force of the Gla-300 Injection Device Compared With Other Commercialized Disposable Insulin Pens.与其他商业化一次性胰岛素笔相比,Gla-300注射装置的准确性和注射力
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Aug 26;10(1):125-30. doi: 10.1177/1932296815601441.
2
Dosing Accuracy of Two Disposable Insulin Pens According to New ISO 11608-1: 2012 Requirements.根据新的ISO 11608-1:2012要求,两种一次性胰岛素笔的给药准确性
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jul 17;10(1):157-61. doi: 10.1177/1932296815595983.
3
Dosing accuracy of commonly used disposable insulin pens.常用一次性胰岛素笔的剂量准确性。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Apr;26(4):901-5. doi: 10.1185/03007991003608878.
4
Dose accuracy comparison between SoloSTAR and FlexPen at three different dose levels.SoloSTAR笔和FlexPen笔在三种不同剂量水平下的剂量准确性比较。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Oct;10(5):359-62. doi: 10.1089/dia.2008.0082.
5
Study on the dosing accuracy of commonly used disposable insulin pens.常用一次性胰岛素笔注射剂量准确性的研究。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Sep;14(9):804-9. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0298. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
6
Injection force of SoloSTAR® compared with other disposable insulin pen devices at constant volume flow rates.在恒定体积流速下,SoloSTAR®与其他一次性胰岛素笔装置的注射力比较。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 Jan 1;5(1):150-5. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500120.
7
Usability of the Gla-300 Injection Device Compared With Three Other Commercialized Disposable Insulin Pens: Results of an Interview-Based Survey.与其他三种商业化一次性胰岛素笔相比,Gla-300注射装置的易用性:基于访谈的调查结果。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jul;9(4):936-8. doi: 10.1177/1932296815586219. Epub 2015 May 22.
8
Comparison of usability and patient preference for the new disposable insulin device Solostar versus Flexpen, lilly disposable pen, and a prototype pen: an open-label study.新型一次性胰岛素笔Solostar与Flexpen、礼来一次性笔及一种原型笔的可用性和患者偏好比较:一项开放标签研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):650-60. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.04.003.
9
Dose accuracy and injection force dynamics of a novel disposable insulin pen.一种新型一次性胰岛素笔的剂量准确性和注射力动态特性
Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2007 Mar;4(2):165-74. doi: 10.1517/17425247.4.2.165.
10
Dose accuracy and injection force of different insulin glargine pens.不同甘精胰岛素笔的剂量准确性和注射力
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Sep 1;7(5):1346-53. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700526.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of High-concentration Insulin Glarigine on the Quality of Life of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pre-post Study (HIGH-QOL STUDY).高浓度甘精胰岛素对2型糖尿病患者生活质量的影响:一项前后对照研究(HIGH-QOL研究)
Intern Med. 2019 Oct 15;58(20):2943-2948. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1794-18. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL to the Same Dose of Glargine 300 U/mL in Japanese Type 1 and 2 Diabetes Patients: A Retrospective Analysis.日本1型和2型糖尿病患者从甘精胰岛素100 U/mL转换为相同剂量的甘精胰岛素300 U/mL的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性分析
Intern Med. 2018;57(10):1381-1389. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9334-17. Epub 2018 May 15.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Usability of the Gla-300 Injection Device Compared With Three Other Commercialized Disposable Insulin Pens: Results of an Interview-Based Survey.与其他三种商业化一次性胰岛素笔相比,Gla-300注射装置的易用性:基于访谈的调查结果。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jul;9(4):936-8. doi: 10.1177/1932296815586219. Epub 2015 May 22.
2
New insulin glargine 300 U/ml compared with glargine 100 U/ml in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes on oral glucose-lowering drugs: a randomized controlled trial (EDITION 3).在接受口服降糖药物治疗的初治2型糖尿病患者中,新型300U/ml甘精胰岛素与100U/ml甘精胰岛素的比较:一项随机对照试验(第3版)
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Apr;17(4):386-94. doi: 10.1111/dom.12438. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
3
Dose Accuracy, Injection Force, and Usability Assessment of a New Half-Unit, Prefilled Insulin Pen.
新型半单位预填充胰岛素笔的剂量准确性、注射力及可用性评估
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Mar;12(2):364-372. doi: 10.1177/1932296817736316. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
4
Insulin glargine 300 U/mL for basal insulin therapy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.甘精胰岛素300 U/mL用于1型和2型糖尿病的基础胰岛素治疗。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2017 Jun 30;10:273-284. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S131358. eCollection 2017.
5
Patients' Preferences for Insulin Injection Devices.患者对胰岛素注射装置的偏好。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Mar;11(2):270-271. doi: 10.1177/1932296816688014. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
6
rDNA insulin glargine U300 - a critical appraisal.重组DNA技术生产的甘精胰岛素U300——批判性评估
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2016 Dec 2;9:425-441. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S87873. eCollection 2016.
7
Ease of Use of the Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL Pen Injector in Insulin-Naïve People With Type 2 Diabetes.甘精胰岛素300 U/mL笔式注射器在初治2型糖尿病患者中的易用性
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Mar;11(2):263-269. doi: 10.1177/1932296816668877. Epub 2016 Sep 25.
New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using oral agents and basal insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 2).
德谷胰岛素 300 单位/毫升与甘精胰岛素 100 单位/毫升治疗口服降糖药和基础胰岛素控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性:一项 6 个月随机对照研究(EDITION 2)
Diabetes Care. 2014 Dec;37(12):3235-43. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0990. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
4
New insulin glargine 300 Units · mL-1 provides a more even activity profile and prolonged glycemic control at steady state compared with insulin glargine 100 Units · mL-1.新的甘精胰岛素 300 单位/毫升与甘精胰岛素 100 单位/毫升相比,具有更平稳的作用谱和更持久的血糖控制。
Diabetes Care. 2015 Apr;38(4):637-43. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0006. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
5
New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using basal and mealtime insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 1).在使用基础胰岛素和餐时胰岛素的 2 型糖尿病患者中,新的甘精胰岛素 300 单位/毫升与甘精胰岛素 100 单位/毫升的比较:6 个月随机对照试验中的血糖控制和低血糖(EDITION 1)。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Oct;37(10):2755-62. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0991. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
6
Effect of glargine insulin delivery method (pen device versus vial/syringe) on glycemic control and patient preferences in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.甘精胰岛素给药方式(笔式装置与小瓶/注射器)对1型和2型糖尿病患者血糖控制及患者偏好的影响。
Endocr Pract. 2014 Jun;20(6):536-9. doi: 10.4158/EP13404.OR.
7
Study on the dosing accuracy of commonly used disposable insulin pens.常用一次性胰岛素笔注射剂量准确性的研究。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Sep;14(9):804-9. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0298. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
8
What can we learn from patient-reported outcomes of insulin pen devices?我们能从患者报告的胰岛素笔装置的结果中学到什么?
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 Nov 1;5(6):1563-71. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500633.
9
Clinical impact of initiating insulin glargine therapy with disposable pen versus vial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a managed care setting.在管理式医疗环境中,2 型糖尿病患者使用一次性笔式胰岛素甘精注射液和瓶装胰岛素起始治疗的临床影响。
Endocr Pract. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):845-52. doi: 10.4158/EP10401.OR.
10
Injection force of SoloSTAR® compared with other disposable insulin pen devices at constant volume flow rates.在恒定体积流速下,SoloSTAR®与其他一次性胰岛素笔装置的注射力比较。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 Jan 1;5(1):150-5. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500120.