Loguercio Alessandro Dourado, Tay Lidia Yileng, Herrera Daniel Rodrigo, Bauer Jose, Reis Alessandra
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, PR, BR.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, PE.
Braz Oral Res. 2015;29:1-7. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0099. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of in-office bleaching and associated tooth sensitivity on application of nano-calcium phosphate paste as desensitizing agent. Bleaching was performed with 35% hydrogen peroxide gel in 40 patients who were randomly divided into placebo and nano-calcium phosphate paste groups. Bleaching efficacy (BE) was evaluated using a value-oriented Vita shade guide. Tooth sensitivity was recorded using a numeric rating scale (0-4) during bleaching and up to 48 h after each session. The primary outcome of absolute risk of tooth sensitivity was compared using the Fisher's exact test (α = 0.05). The intensity of tooth sensitivity and the efficacy of in-office bleaching were also statistically evaluated. No significant differences in absolute risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity were detected between the groups (p = 1.0 and p = 0.53, respectively). BE was also found to be similar between the groups (p = 0.67). Although the use of a nano-calcium phosphate paste associated with fluoride and potassium nitrate did not influence the whitening outcome, but it also did not reduce bleaching-induced tooth sensitivity.
该研究旨在评估诊室漂白的效果以及纳米磷酸钙糊剂作为脱敏剂使用时的相关牙齿敏感性。对40例患者使用35%过氧化氢凝胶进行漂白,这些患者被随机分为安慰剂组和纳米磷酸钙糊剂组。使用以数值为导向的Vita比色板评估漂白效果(BE)。在漂白期间以及每次疗程后长达48小时,使用数字评分量表(0 - 4)记录牙齿敏感性。使用Fisher精确检验(α = 0.05)比较牙齿敏感绝对风险的主要结果。还对牙齿敏感的强度和诊室漂白的效果进行了统计学评估。两组之间在牙齿敏感的绝对风险和强度方面未检测到显著差异(分别为p = 1.0和p = 0.53)。两组之间的BE也相似(p = 0.67)。尽管使用与氟化物和硝酸钾相关的纳米磷酸钙糊剂不会影响美白效果,但它也不会降低漂白引起的牙齿敏感性。