Isiordia-Espinoza M A, Aragon-Martinez O H, Martínez-Morales J F, Zapata-Morales J R
Departamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali, Mexico.
Departamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, S.L.P., Mexico.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Nov;53(9):796-804. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the risk of surgical wound infection and the adverse effects of amoxicillin in healthy patients who required excision of third molars. We identified eligible reports from searches of PubMed, Medline®, the Cochrane Library, Imbiomed, LILACS, and Google Scholar. Studies that met our minimum requirements were evaluated using inclusion and exclusion criteria and the Oxford Quality Scale. Those with a score of 3 or more on this Scale were included and their data were extracted and analysed. For evaluation of the risk of infection the absolute risk reduction, number needed to treat, and 95% CI were calculated. For evaluation of the risk of an adverse effect the absolute risk increase, number needed to harm, and 95% CI were calculated using the Risk Reduction Calculator. Each meta-analysis was made with the help of the Mantel-Haenszel random effects model, and estimates of risk (OR) and 95% CI were calculated using the Review Manager 5.3, from the Cochrane Library. A significant risk was assumed when the lower limit of the 95% CI was greater than 1. Probabilities of less than 0.05 were accepted as significant. The results showed that there was no reduction in the risk of infection when amoxicillin was given before or after operation compared with an untreated group or placebo. In conclusion, this study suggests that amoxicillin given prophylactically or postoperatively does not reduce the risk of infection in healthy patients having their third molars extracted.
本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估在需要拔除第三磨牙的健康患者中手术伤口感染的风险以及阿莫西林的不良反应。我们通过检索PubMed、Medline®、Cochrane图书馆、Imbiomed、LILACS和谷歌学术搜索来确定符合条件的报告。使用纳入和排除标准以及牛津质量量表对符合我们最低要求的研究进行评估。在此量表上得分为3分或更高的研究被纳入,其数据被提取并分析。为了评估感染风险,计算了绝对风险降低率、治疗所需人数和95%置信区间。为了评估不良反应风险,使用风险降低计算器计算了绝对风险增加率、伤害所需人数和95%置信区间。每项荟萃分析均借助Mantel-Haenszel随机效应模型进行,并使用Cochrane图书馆的Review Manager 5.3计算风险估计值(OR)和95%置信区间。当95%置信区间的下限大于1时,认为存在显著风险。小于0.05的概率被视为具有显著性。结果表明,与未治疗组或安慰剂相比,术前或术后给予阿莫西林并没有降低感染风险。总之,本研究表明,在健康患者拔除第三磨牙时,预防性或术后给予阿莫西林并不能降低感染风险。