Suppr超能文献

电神经刺激在脑卒中上肢康复中辅助康复方法的应用:一项基于随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析的系统评价。

The Adjunct of Electric Neurostimulation to Rehabilitation Approaches in Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Institute of Graduate Studies, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Neuromodulation. 2022 Dec;25(8):1197-1214. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Feb 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This review analyzed the current evidence and the potential for the application of electric neurostimulation such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in upper limb stroke rehabilitation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using network meta-analysis (NMA), searching the following data bases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar, using specific keywords, from January 2010 to April 2021, and assessing the effects of "tDCS" or "VNS" combined with other therapies on upper limb motor function and activities of daily living (ADL) after stroke.

RESULTS

We included 38 RCTs with 1261 participants. Pairwise NMA showed transcutaneous VNS (tVNS) and anodal tDCS were effective in improving upper limb motor function (tVNS: mean difference [MD]: 5.50; 95% CI [0.67-11.67]; p < 0.05; anodal tDCS: MD: 5.23; 95% CI [2.45-8.01]; p < 0.05). tVNS and tDCS (anodal and cathodal) were also effective in improving ADL performance after stroke (tVNS: standard MD [SMD]: 0.96; 95% CI [0.15-2.06]; p < 0.05; anodal tDCS: SMD: 3.78; 95% CI [0.0-7.56]; p < 0.05; cathodal tDCS: SMD: 5.38; 95% CI [0.22-10.54]; p < 0.05). Surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis revealed that tVNS is the best ranked treatment in improving upper limb motor function and performance in ADL after stroke. There was no difference in safety between VNS and its control interventions, measured by reported adverse events (VNS: risk ratio = 1.02 [95% CI = 0.48-2.17; I = 0; p = 0.96]).

CONCLUSION

Moderate- to high-quality evidence suggests that tVNS and anodal tDCS were effective in improving upper limb motor function in both acute/subacute and chronic stroke. In addition to tVNS and anodal tDCS, cathodal tDCS is also effective in improving ADL performance after stroke.

摘要

目的

本综述分析了经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和迷走神经刺激(VNS)等电神经刺激在脑卒中上肢康复中的应用的现有证据和潜力。

材料和方法

我们使用网络荟萃分析(NMA)对 2010 年 1 月至 2021 年 4 月期间使用特定关键词在 PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane 和 Google Scholar 等数据库中进行的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统回顾,并评估了“tDCS”或“VNS”联合其他疗法对脑卒中后上肢运动功能和日常生活活动(ADL)的影响。

结果

我们纳入了 38 项 RCT,共 1261 名参与者。配对 NMA 显示经皮 VNS(tVNS)和阳极 tDCS 可有效改善上肢运动功能(tVNS:平均差异 [MD]:5.50;95%置信区间 [0.67-11.67];p<0.05;阳极 tDCS:MD:5.23;95%置信区间 [2.45-8.01];p<0.05)。tVNS 和 tDCS(阳极和阴极)也可有效改善脑卒中后 ADL 表现(tVNS:标准 MD [SMD]:0.96;95%置信区间 [0.15-2.06];p<0.05;阳极 tDCS:SMD:3.78;95%置信区间 [0.0-7.56];p<0.05;阴极 tDCS:SMD:5.38;95%置信区间 [0.22-10.54];p<0.05)。累积排序曲线下面积分析表明,tVNS 是改善脑卒中后上肢运动功能和 ADL 表现的最佳治疗方法。通过报告的不良事件测量,VNS 与对照干预之间的安全性无差异(VNS:风险比=1.02 [95%置信区间=0.48-2.17;I=0;p=0.96])。

结论

中-高质量证据表明,tVNS 和阳极 tDCS 可有效改善急性/亚急性期和慢性脑卒中患者的上肢运动功能。除 tVNS 和阳极 tDCS 外,阴极 tDCS 也可有效改善脑卒中后 ADL 表现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验