Ponsot Emmanuel, Devolder Pauline, Dhooge Ingeborg, Verhulst Sarah
STMS Lab (CNRS/Ircam/Sorbonne Université, Ministère de La Culture), 1 Place Igor Stravinsky, 75004, Paris, France.
Hearing Technology @ WAVES, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University, Technologiepark 126, 9052, Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2025 Apr 21. doi: 10.1007/s10162-025-00985-2.
Assessing the contribution of cochlear synaptopathy (CS) to the variability in speech-in-noise intelligibility among individuals remains a challenge. While several studies have proposed biomarkers for CS based on neural phase-locking to the temporal envelope (ENV), fewer have investigated how CS affects the coding of temporal fine structure (TFS), despite its crucial role in speech-in-noise perception. In this study, we specifically examined whether TFS-based markers of CS could be derived from electrophysiological responses and psychophysical detection thresholds of spectral modulation (SM) in a complex tone, which serves as a parametric model of speech.
We employed an integrated approach, combining psychophysical testing with frequency-following response (FFR) measurements in three groups of participants: young normal-hearing (n = 15, 12 females, age 21 ± 1); older normal-hearing (n = 16, 11 females, age 47 ± 6); and older hearing-impaired (n = 14, 8 females, age 52 ± 6). We expanded on previous work by assessing phase-locking to both ENV, using a 4-kHz rectangular amplitude-modulated (RAM) tone, and TFS, using a low-frequency (< 1.5 kHz) SM complex tone.
Overall, FFR results showed significant reductions in neural phase-locking to both ENV and TFS components with age and hearing loss. Specifically, the strength of TFS-related FFRs, particularly the component corresponding to the harmonic closest to the peak of the spectral envelope (~ 500 Hz), was negatively correlated with age, even after adjusting for audiometric thresholds. This TFS marker also correlated with ENV-related FFRs derived from the RAM tone, suggesting a shared decline in phase-locking capacity across low and high cochlear frequencies. Computational simulations of the auditory periphery indicated that the observed FFR strength reduction with age is consistent with approximately 50% loss of auditory nerve fibers, aligning with histopathological data. However, the TFS-based FFR marker did not account for variability in speech intelligibility observed in the same participants. Psychophysical measurements showed no age-related effects and were unrelated to the TFS-based FFR marker, highlighting the need for further psychophysical research to establish a behavioral counterpart.
Altogether, our results demonstrate that FFRs to vowel-like stimuli can serve as a complementary electrophysiological marker for assessing neural coding fidelity to stimulus TFS. This approach could provide a valuable tool for better understanding the impact of CS on an important coding dimension for speech-in-noise perception.
评估耳蜗突触病变(CS)对个体噪声中言语可懂度变异性的影响仍然是一项挑战。虽然有几项研究基于对时间包络(ENV)的神经锁相提出了CS的生物标志物,但较少有研究调查CS如何影响时间精细结构(TFS)的编码,尽管其在噪声中言语感知中起着关键作用。在本研究中,我们专门研究了基于TFS的CS标志物是否可以从复杂音调的电生理反应和频谱调制(SM)的心理物理检测阈值中得出,复杂音调可作为言语的参数模型。
我们采用了一种综合方法,将心理物理测试与三组参与者的频率跟随反应(FFR)测量相结合:年轻听力正常者(n = 15,12名女性,年龄21±1岁);年长听力正常者(n = 16,11名女性,年龄47±6岁);以及年长听力受损者(n = 14,8名女性,年龄52±6岁)。我们通过评估对ENV的锁相(使用4 kHz矩形调幅(RAM)音调)和对TFS的锁相(使用低频(<1.5 kHz)SM复合音调)扩展了先前的工作。
总体而言,FFR结果显示,随着年龄增长和听力损失,对ENV和TFS成分的神经锁相显著降低。具体而言,与TFS相关的FFR强度,特别是与最接近频谱包络峰值(约500 Hz)的谐波相对应的成分,即使在调整听力阈值后,也与年龄呈负相关。这个TFS标志物也与从RAM音调得出的与ENV相关的FFR相关,表明耳蜗低频和高频的锁相能力共同下降。听觉外周的计算模拟表明,观察到的FFR强度随年龄的降低与约50%的听神经纤维损失一致,与组织病理学数据相符。然而,基于TFS的FFR标志物并不能解释在相同参与者中观察到的言语可懂度变异性。心理物理测量未显示与年龄相关的影响,且与基于TFS的FFR标志物无关,这突出了需要进一步进行心理物理研究以建立行为对应物。
总之,我们的结果表明,对类元音刺激的FFR可作为一种补充性电生理标志物,用于评估对刺激TFS的神经编码保真度。这种方法可为更好地理解CS对噪声中言语感知的一个重要编码维度的影响提供有价值的工具。