Ramjeet Janet, Smith Jane, Adams Malcolm
Lecturer in Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery Research Unit, Faculty of Health, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UKLecturer in Health Psychology, School of Medicine Health Policy and Practice, Faculty of Health, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UKProfessor of Clinical Psychology, School of Medicine Health Policy and Practice, Faculty of Health, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Nov;17(11c):418-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02579.x.
This systematic review examines how specific coping strategies are associated with psychological and physical outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis.
Rheumatoid arthritis is a long-term condition that people cope with but it is unclear whether specific coping strategies have an effect on mood and function. Therefore a systematic review was undertaken of the coping with arthritis literature and 174 studies were initially included. Further examination determined that 31 studies (11 longitudinal and 20 cross sectional) were finally included in the review. The 31 studies were clinically and methodologically diverse; therefore the analysis of results was a qualitative synthesis. Coping strategies that contributed to the prediction of outcomes were allocated to a new structure for the classification of coping.
The results demonstrated there was not sufficient, consistent evidence to support the overall view that individual coping strategies contributed to longitudinal outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. However, major differences in the design of included studies may have hindered the comparison of results. There was some evidence from longitudinal studies that patients who used resting, inactivity, etc. (helplessness category) experienced negative outcomes. Avoidance (escape) was the most common overall category associated with predominantly negative outcomes in both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.
There was generally limited evidence to suggest an association between coping strategies and outcomes but the design of studies and the lack of clarity about coping strategies were identified as problems. This study used a new framework for the conceptualisation of coping strategies, thus contributing to further examining the utility of coping strategies and contributing to their redefinition.
The use of helplessness (inactivity and passive coping) and escape/avoidant coping strategies, including denial and wishful thinking, could be identified and addressed by nurses and other health professionals to reduce the associated negative outcomes.
本系统评价探讨类风湿关节炎患者的特定应对策略与心理及身体状况之间的关联。
类风湿关节炎是一种需长期应对的疾病,但尚不清楚特定应对策略是否会对情绪和功能产生影响。因此,我们对有关关节炎应对的文献进行了系统评价,最初纳入了174项研究。进一步筛选后确定最终纳入该评价的有31项研究(11项纵向研究和20项横断面研究)。这31项研究在临床和方法学上存在差异;因此,结果分析采用定性综合分析。将有助于预测结果的应对策略归为一种新的应对分类结构。
结果表明,没有足够的、一致的证据支持个体应对策略会对类风湿关节炎的纵向结果产生影响这一总体观点。然而,纳入研究设计上的重大差异可能阻碍了结果的比较。纵向研究有一些证据表明,采用休息、不活动等应对方式(无助类别)的患者会出现负面结果。在横断面研究和纵向研究中,回避(逃避)是与主要负面结果相关的最常见总体类别。
总体而言,表明应对策略与结果之间存在关联的证据有限,但研究设计和应对策略缺乏明确性被认为是问题所在。本研究采用了一种新的应对策略概念化框架,从而有助于进一步检验应对策略的效用并对其重新定义。
护士和其他卫生专业人员可识别并处理无助(不活动和被动应对)以及逃避/回避应对策略的使用,包括否认和一厢情愿的想法,以减少相关的负面结果。