Arcuri E A, Santos J L, Silva M R
Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
J Hypertens Suppl. 1989 Dec;7(6):S60-1. doi: 10.1097/00004872-198900076-00026.
This study followed blood pressure in 11 subjects 5 years after slight or established hypertension had been revealed using a cuff of the correct width (appropriate to arm circumference); at that time, the use of a standard-width cuff (12 cm) had shown a blood pressure within the normal range. For the present study, blood pressure was determined indirectly under very strict conditions so that a faithful comparison between the readings with both cuffs could be achieved. An important underestimate of blood pressure was detected in thin arms when the standard width cuff was used. The present measurements showed a consistent increase in blood pressure with standard-width cuff readings, confirming the hypertension that had been identified using the correct cuff width 5 years previously. These results support our previous hypothesis that early diagnosis of hypertension can be masked by the standard-width cuff, particularly in lean persons.
本研究对11名受试者在使用正确宽度(与上臂围相称)的袖带发现轻度或已确诊高血压5年后的血压情况进行了跟踪;当时,使用标准宽度袖带(12厘米)测得的血压在正常范围内。在本研究中,在非常严格的条件下间接测定血压,以便能够对两种袖带的读数进行可靠比较。使用标准宽度袖带时,在瘦手臂人群中检测到了重要的血压低估情况。目前的测量结果显示,使用标准宽度袖带读数时血压持续升高,证实了5年前使用正确宽度袖带所确定的高血压情况。这些结果支持了我们之前的假设,即高血压的早期诊断可能会被标准宽度袖带掩盖,尤其是在瘦人当中。