Suppr超能文献

对1000例有超声异常的胎儿进行产前单核苷酸多态性阵列检测:致病性、意外性和易感性拷贝数变异

Prenatal SNP array testing in 1000 fetuses with ultrasound anomalies: causative, unexpected and susceptibility CNVs.

作者信息

Srebniak Malgorzata I, Diderich Karin Em, Joosten Marieke, Govaerts Lutgarde Cp, Knijnenburg Jeroen, de Vries Femke At, Boter Marjan, Lont Debora, Knapen Maarten Fcm, de Wit Merel C, Go Attie Tji, Galjaard Robert-Jan H, Van Opstal Diane

机构信息

Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 May;24(5):645-51. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.193. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

Abstract

To evaluate the diagnostic value of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array testing in 1033 fetuses with ultrasound anomalies we investigated the prevalence and genetic nature of pathogenic findings. We reclassified all pathogenic findings into three categories: causative findings; unexpected diagnoses (UD); and susceptibility loci (SL) for neurodevelopmental disorders. After exclusion of trisomy 13, 18, 21, sex-chromosomal aneuploidy and triploidies, in 76/1033 (7.4%) fetuses a pathogenic chromosome abnormality was detected by genomic SNP array: in 19/1033 cases (1.8%) a microscopically detectable abnormality was found and in 57/1033 (5.5%) fetuses a pathogenic submicroscopic chromosome abnormality was detected. 58% (n=44) of all these pathogenic chromosome abnormalities involved a causative finding, 35% (n=27) a SL for neurodevelopmental disorder, and 6% (n=5) a UD of an early-onset untreatable disease. In 0.3% of parental samples an incidental pathogenic finding was encountered. Our results confirm that a genomic array should be the preferred first-tier technique in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies. All UDs involved early-onset diseases, which is beneficial for the patients to know. It also seems that UDs occur at a comparable frequency among microscopic and submicroscopic pathogenic findings. SL were more often detected than in pregnancies without ultrasound anomalies.

摘要

为评估单核苷酸多态性(SNP)阵列检测在1033例有超声异常的胎儿中的诊断价值,我们调查了致病结果的患病率和遗传性质。我们将所有致病结果重新分类为三类:致病发现;意外诊断(UD);以及神经发育障碍的易感位点(SL)。在排除13、18、21三体、性染色体非整倍体和三倍体后,在1033例胎儿中的76例(7.4%)通过基因组SNP阵列检测到致病染色体异常:在1033例中的19例(1.8%)发现了显微镜下可检测到的异常,在1033例中的57例(5.5%)胎儿中检测到致病的亚显微染色体异常。所有这些致病染色体异常中有58%(n = 44)涉及致病发现,35%(n = 27)为神经发育障碍的SL,6%(n = 5)为早发性不可治疗疾病的UD。在0.3%的亲代样本中遇到了偶然的致病发现。我们的结果证实,基因组阵列应该是有超声异常胎儿首选的一线技术。所有UD都涉及早发性疾病,这对患者了解情况是有益的。似乎UD在显微镜下和亚显微致病发现中的发生频率相当。与无超声异常的妊娠相比,SL的检测更为常见。

相似文献

1
Prenatal SNP array testing in 1000 fetuses with ultrasound anomalies: causative, unexpected and susceptibility CNVs.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 May;24(5):645-51. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.193. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
2
[Application of single nucleotide polymorphism array in prenatal diagnosis for fetuses with abnormal ultrasound findings].
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jul 25;53(7):464-470. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2018.07.005.
6
Single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-array) analysis for fetuses with abnormal nasal bone.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jun;309(6):2475-2482. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07122-5. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
7

引用本文的文献

3
Challenges and Pragmatic Solutions in Pre-Test and Post-Test Genetic Counseling for Prenatal Exome Sequencing.
Appl Clin Genet. 2023 May 15;16:89-97. doi: 10.2147/TACG.S411185. eCollection 2023.
9
SNP-Based Chromosomal Microarray Analysis for Detecting DNA Copy Number Variations in Fetuses with a Thickened Nuchal Fold.
Sovrem Tekhnologii Med. 2021;13(6):72-76. doi: 10.17691/stm2021.13.6.08. Epub 2021 Dec 28.

本文引用的文献

2
Whole-genome array as a first-line cytogenetic test in prenatal diagnosis.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;45(4):363-72. doi: 10.1002/uog.14745.
3
Committee Opinion No. 581: the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis.
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;122(6):1374-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000438962.16108.d1.
4
Types of array findings detectable in cytogenetic diagnosis: a proposal for a generic classification.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Jul;22(7):856-8. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.254. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
6
Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;41(6):610-20. doi: 10.1002/uog.12464. Epub 2013 May 7.
8
Estimates of penetrance for recurrent pathogenic copy-number variations.
Genet Med. 2013 Jun;15(6):478-81. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.164. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
9
Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 6;367(23):2175-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203382.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验