• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

避孕建议:审视患者年龄与种族的作用

Recommendations for Contraception: Examining the Role of Patients' Age and Race.

作者信息

Williams Amanda, Kajiwara Kasey, Soon Reni, Salcedo Jennifer, Tschann Mary, Elia Jennifer, Pauker Kristin, Kaneshiro Bliss

机构信息

Graduate School of Education, University of Bristol, United Kingdom (AW).

出版信息

Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2018 Jan;77(1):7-13.

PMID:29333335
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5760309/
Abstract

The literature suggests that women of different races are more or less likely to use certain contraceptive methods and patient race can influence which contraceptive recommendations a provider makes. To explore whether health care providers treat individuals of different races differently, we conducted a preliminary investigation on whether medical students recommended different contraceptive methods for hypothetical patients presenting with the same clinical features who only varied by race. Third- and fourth-year medical students (n=103) at the University of Hawai'i completed an online survey. Students read case studies about a 23-year-old and 36-year-old patient and then made contraceptive recommendations. All students reviewed the same scenarios, with the exception of the patient's name which was randomly assigned to represent one of five racial/ethnic groups (White, Chinese, Filipina, Native Hawaiian, and Micronesian). Recommendations were analyzed using χ tests and bivariate logistic regressions. For the younger patient, students were most likely to recommend intrauterine devices (IUDs), followed by the contraceptive pill and Etonogestrel implant; recommendations did not differ by race/ethnicity (P = .91). For the older patient, students were most likely to recommend IUDs or sterilization, and Micronesian women were more likely to receive sterilization recommendations compared to White women (60% versus 27%, P = .04). In summary, contraceptive recommendations, specifically the frequency of recommending sterilization varied by race. Our findings add to the literature exploring the role of a patient's race/ethnicity on recommendations for contraception and highlights the need for more studies exploring the etiology of health care disparities.

摘要

文献表明,不同种族的女性使用某些避孕方法的可能性或多或少存在差异,患者的种族会影响医疗服务提供者给出的避孕建议。为了探究医疗服务提供者是否会区别对待不同种族的个体,我们针对医学生是否会为具有相同临床特征但仅种族不同的假设患者推荐不同的避孕方法进行了初步调查。夏威夷大学的三年级和四年级医学生(n = 103)完成了一项在线调查。学生们阅读了关于一名23岁和一名36岁患者的病例研究,然后给出避孕建议。所有学生查看的都是相同的场景,只是患者姓名被随机分配以代表五个种族/族裔群体之一(白人、华裔、菲律宾裔、夏威夷原住民和密克罗尼西亚人)。使用χ检验和双变量逻辑回归分析建议。对于较年轻的患者,学生最有可能推荐宫内节育器(IUD),其次是避孕药和依托孕烯植入剂;不同种族/族裔的建议没有差异(P = 0.91)。对于年龄较大的患者,学生最有可能推荐IUD或绝育手术,与白人女性相比,密克罗尼西亚女性更有可能收到绝育手术建议(60%对27%,P = 0.04)。总之,避孕建议,特别是推荐绝育手术的频率因种族而异。我们的研究结果补充了探索患者种族/族裔在避孕建议中作用的文献,并强调需要更多研究来探索医疗保健差异的病因。

相似文献

1
Recommendations for Contraception: Examining the Role of Patients' Age and Race.避孕建议:审视患者年龄与种族的作用
Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2018 Jan;77(1):7-13.
2
Highly-Effective Contraception Use More Likely Among Native Hawaiian Women than Non-Native Hawaiian Women at Title X Clinics in Hawai'i.在夏威夷的第十类诊所中,夏威夷原住民女性比非夏威夷原住民女性更有可能使用高效避孕措施。
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2020 Jan;79(1):16-22.
3
Racial and ethnic disparities in contraceptive knowledge among women veterans in the ECUUN study.东卡罗来纳大学退伍军人研究(ECUUN研究)中女性退伍军人在避孕知识方面的种族和族裔差异。
Contraception. 2017 Jul;96(1):54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
4
Choice of contraceptive modality by women in Norway.挪威女性对避孕方式的选择。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994 Jan;73(1):48-52. doi: 10.3109/00016349409013393.
5
Racial and ethnic disparities in contraceptive method choice in California.加利福尼亚州避孕方法选择中的种族和民族差异。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011 Sep;43(3):173-80. doi: 10.1363/4317311. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
6
Postpartum contraception: initiation and effectiveness in a large universal healthcare system.产后避孕:大型全民医疗保健系统中的起始情况与有效性
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):55.e1-55.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.036. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
7
Quality and Content of Patient-Provider Communication About Contraception: Differences by Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status.患者与提供者之间关于避孕的沟通质量和内容:按种族/民族和社会经济地位的差异。
Womens Health Issues. 2017 Sep-Oct;27(5):530-538. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
8
Characteristics of Females Who Use Contraception at Coitarche: An Analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth 2006-2010 Database.初次性交时使用避孕措施的女性特征:对2006 - 2010年全国家庭成长调查数据库的分析
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Dec;24(12):972-7. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5219. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
9
Racial and ethnic differences in women's preferences for features of contraceptive methods.女性对避孕方法特征偏好的种族和族裔差异。
Contraception. 2016 May;93(5):406-11. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.010. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
10
Racial/ethnic differences in contraceptive preferences, beliefs, and self-efficacy among women veterans.退伍女兵在避孕偏好、观念及自我效能方面的种族/民族差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;216(5):504.e1-504.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.178. Epub 2017 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared Decision-Making: The Way Forward for Postpartum Contraceptive Counseling.共同决策:产后避孕咨询的前进方向。
Open Access J Contracept. 2022 Aug 25;13:121-129. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S360833. eCollection 2022.
2
Fulfillment of Desired Postpartum Permanent Contraception: a Health Disparities Issue.实现理想的产后永久性避孕:一个健康不平等问题。
Reprod Sci. 2022 Sep;29(9):2620-2624. doi: 10.1007/s43032-022-00912-3. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
3
A Historical and Contemporary Review of the Contextualization and Social Determinants of Health of Micronesian Migrants in the United States.美国密克罗尼西亚移民健康情境化与社会决定因素的历史与当代综述
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2021 Sep;80(9 Suppl 1):88-101.
4
Insights Into Provider Bias in Family Planning from a Novel Shared Decision Making Based Counseling Initiative in Rural, Indigenous Guatemala.从危地马拉农村土著地区基于新型共享决策的咨询计划看计划生育中的提供者偏见。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020 Mar 31;8(1):10-17. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00377. Print 2020 Mar 30.
5
Highly-Effective Contraception Use More Likely Among Native Hawaiian Women than Non-Native Hawaiian Women at Title X Clinics in Hawai'i.在夏威夷的第十类诊所中,夏威夷原住民女性比非夏威夷原住民女性更有可能使用高效避孕措施。
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2020 Jan;79(1):16-22.

本文引用的文献

1
Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008-2011.2008 - 2011年美国意外怀孕率下降情况
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 3;374(9):843-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1506575.
2
Younger and Sicker: Comparing Micronesians to Other Ethnicities in Hawaii.更年轻且病情更重:密克罗尼西亚人与夏威夷其他族裔的比较。
Am J Public Health. 2016 Mar;106(3):485-91. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302921. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
3
Current Contraceptive Use and Variation by Selected Characteristics Among Women Aged 15-44: United States, 2011-2013.2011 - 2013年美国15 - 44岁女性当前的避孕措施使用情况及按选定特征划分的差异
Natl Health Stat Report. 2015 Nov 10(86):1-14.
4
Trends and Disparities in Postpartum Sterilization after Cesarean Section, 2000 through 2008.2000年至2008年剖宫产术后绝育的趋势与差异
Womens Health Issues. 2015 Nov-Dec;25(6):634-40. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
5
Surgical sterilization, regret, and race: contemporary patterns.手术绝育、后悔情绪与种族:当代模式
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Mar;50:31-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.10.010. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
6
Contraception for adolescents.青少年避孕。
Pediatrics. 2014 Oct;134(4):e1244-56. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2299.
7
Factors associated with sterilization use among women leaving a U.S. jail: a mixed methods study.美国监狱女性出狱后绝育使用相关因素:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 31;14:773. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-773.
8
Strategies for reducing health disparities — selected CDC-sponsored interventions, United States, 2014. Foreword.减少健康差距的策略——美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)赞助的部分干预措施,2014年。前言。
MMWR Suppl. 2014 Apr 18;63(1):1-2.
9
Racial/ethnic disparities in contraceptive use: variation by age and women's reproductive experiences.种族/民族差异在避孕措施的使用:按年龄和女性生殖经历的变化。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;210(6):526.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.037. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
10
Intergroup relations and health disparities: a social psychological perspective.群体间关系与健康差异:社会心理学视角
Health Psychol. 2013 May;32(5):514-24. doi: 10.1037/a0030358.