Zheng L, Wu J, Wang G, Persuitte G, Ma Y, Zou L, Zhang L, Zhao M, Wang J, Lan Qin, Liu Z, Fan H, Li J
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Research Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Preventive Medicine, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016 Apr;70(4):424-30. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.128. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Exercise is considered a protective factor in the prevention of type 2 diabetes, although its role as a sole treatment for pre-diabetes remains unknown. The present meta-analysis compared the effect of exercise-only with exercise-diet interventions on plasma glucose levels among a pre-diabetic population.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess the quality of each trial. Two reviewers independently performed quality assessment of all included articles. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled effect.
A total of 4021 participants from 12 studies were included in this meta-analysis, 2045 of them were in the intervention group and 1976 were in the control group. Compared with the exercise-only interventions, the exercise-diet interventions showed a significant effect on decreasing fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels, with a weighted mean difference (WMD) =-0.22 mmol/l, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.25, -0.18 (Z=12.06, P<0.05). The subgroup effect of exercise-only interventions did not produce a statistically significant result (WMD=-0.09 mmol/l, 95% CI: -0.18, 0.00, Z=1.91, P>0.05). According to the intervention periods, the pooled effect in the ⩾2-year group was the highest, and its WMD (95% CI) was -0.24 mmol/l (-0.43,-0.05). The pooled effects were statistically significant among the elderly and those of American and European descent, with WMD (95% CI) being -0.19 mmol/l (95% CI: -0.22, -0.15), -0.17 mmol/l (-0.21,-0.12) and -0.22 mmol/l (-0.27, -0.17), respectively.
Evidence from published trials indicates that exercise-diet interventions showed a significant effect on decreasing FPG levels.
背景/目的:运动被认为是预防2型糖尿病的一个保护因素,尽管其作为糖尿病前期唯一治疗方法的作用尚不清楚。本荟萃分析比较了单纯运动干预与运动-饮食干预对糖尿病前期人群血糖水平的影响。
受试者/方法:使用PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库进行文献检索。采用Cochrane协作工具评估每个试验的质量。两名评价者独立对所有纳入文章进行质量评估。采用随机效应模型计算合并效应。
本荟萃分析共纳入来自12项研究的4021名参与者,其中2045名在干预组,1976名在对照组。与单纯运动干预相比,运动-饮食干预在降低空腹血糖(FPG)水平方面显示出显著效果,加权平均差(WMD)=-0.22 mmol/l,95%置信区间(CI):-0.25,-0.18(Z=12.06,P<0.05)。单纯运动干预的亚组效应未产生统计学显著结果(WMD=-0.09 mmol/l,95%CI:-0.18,0.00,Z=1.91,P>0.05)。根据干预期,⩾2年组的合并效应最高,其WMD(95%CI)为-0.24 mmol/l(-0.43,-0.05)。在老年人以及美国和欧洲血统人群中,合并效应具有统计学显著性,WMD(95%CI)分别为-0.19 mmol/l(95%CI:-0.22,-0.15)、-0.17 mmol/l(-0.21,-0.12)和-0.22 mmol/l(-0.27,-0.17)。
已发表试验的证据表明,运动-饮食干预在降低FPG水平方面显示出显著效果。