Beavers D P, Beavers K M, Loeser R F, Walton N R, Lyles M F, Nicklas B J, Shapses S A, Newman J J, Messier S P
Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 Jun;22(6):726-33. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
To determine the effects of dietary-induced weight loss (D) and weight loss plus exercise (D + E) compared to exercise alone (E) on bone mineral density (BMD) in older adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA).
Data come from 284 older (66.0 ± 6.2 years), overweight/obese (body mass index (BMI) 33.4 ± 3.7 kg/m2), adults with knee OA enrolled in the Intensive Diet and Exercise for Arthritis (IDEA) study. Participants were randomized to 18 months of walking and strength training (E; n = 95), dietary-induced weight loss targeting 10% of baseline weight (D; n = 88) or a combination of the two (D + E; n = 101). Body weight and composition (DXA), regional BMD, were obtained at baseline and 18 months.
E, D, and D + E groups lost 1.3 ± 4.5 kg, 9.1 ± 8.6 kg and 10.4 ± 8.0 kg, respectively (P < 0.01). Significant treatment effects were observed for BMD in both hip and femoral neck regions, with the D and D + E groups showing similar relative losses compared to E (both P < 0.01). Despite reduced BMD, fewer overall participants had T-scores indicative of osteoporosis after intervention (9 at 18 months vs 10 at baseline). Within the D and D + E groups, changes in hip and femoral neck, but not spine, BMD correlated positively with changes in body weight (r = 0.21 and 0.54 respectively, both P ≤ 0.01).
Weight loss via an intensive dietary intervention, with or without exercise, results in bone loss at the hip and femoral neck in overweight and obese, older adults with OA. Although the exercise intervention did not attenuate weight loss-associated reductions in BMD, classification of osteoporosis and osteopenia remained unchanged.
NCT00381290.
比较饮食诱导减重(D)、减重加运动(D + E)与单纯运动(E)对老年膝骨关节炎(OA)患者骨密度(BMD)的影响。
数据来自284名年龄较大(66.0 ± 6.2岁)、超重/肥胖(体重指数(BMI)33.4 ± 3.7 kg/m²)的膝OA成年患者,他们参与了关节炎强化饮食与运动(IDEA)研究。参与者被随机分为三组,分别进行为期18个月的步行和力量训练(E组;n = 95)、以基线体重的10%为目标的饮食诱导减重(D组;n = 88)或两者结合(D + E组;n = 101)。在基线和18个月时测量体重和身体成分(双能X线吸收法)以及局部骨密度。
E组、D组和D + E组分别减重1.3 ± 4.5 kg、9.1 ± 8.6 kg和10.4 ± 8.0 kg(P < 0.01)。在髋部和股骨颈区域观察到显著的治疗效果,D组和D + E组与E组相比显示出相似的相对骨密度降低(均P < 0.01)。尽管骨密度降低,但干预后总体参与者中T值表明骨质疏松的人数减少(18个月时为9人,基线时为10人)。在D组和D + E组中,髋部和股骨颈而非脊柱的骨密度变化与体重变化呈正相关(分别为r = 0.21和0.54,均P ≤ 0.01)。
通过强化饮食干预减重,无论是否有运动,都会导致超重和肥胖的老年OA患者髋部和股骨颈骨质流失。尽管运动干预并未减弱与体重减轻相关的骨密度降低,但骨质疏松和骨质减少的分类仍未改变。
NCT00381290。