Howells Lara, Musaddaq Besma, McKay Ailsa J, Majeed Azeem
Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 21;6(12):e013806. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013806.
To review the clinical outcomes of combined diet and physical activity interventions for populations at high risk of type 2 diabetes.
Overview of systematic reviews (search dates April-December 2015).
Any level of care; no geographical restriction.
Adults at high risk of diabetes (as per measures of glycaemia, risk assessment or presence of risk factors).
Combined diet and physical activity interventions including ≥2 interactions with a healthcare professional, and ≥12 months follow-up.
Primary: glycaemia, diabetes incidence. Secondary: behaviour change, measures of adiposity, vascular disease and mortality.
19 recent reviews were identified for inclusion; 5 with AMSTAR scores <8. Most considered only randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and RCTs were the major data source in the remainder. Five trials were included in most reviews. Almost all analyses reported that interventions were associated with net reductions in diabetes incidence, measures of glycaemia and adiposity, at follow-up durations of up to 23 years (typically <6). Small effect sizes and potentially transient effect were reported in some studies, and some reviewers noted that durability of intervention impact was potentially sensitive to duration of intervention and adherence to behaviour change. Behaviour change, vascular disease and mortality outcome data were infrequently reported, and evidence of the impact of intervention on these outcomes was minimal. Evidence for age effect was mixed, and sex and ethnicity effect were little considered.
Relatively long-duration lifestyle interventions can limit or delay progression to diabetes under trial conditions. However, outcomes from more time-limited interventions, and those applied in routine clinical settings, appear more variable, in keeping with the findings of recent pragmatic trials. There is little evidence of intervention impact on vascular outcomes or mortality end points in any context. 'Real-world' implementation of lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention may be expected to lead to modest outcomes.
回顾针对2型糖尿病高危人群的饮食与体育活动联合干预的临床结局。
系统评价概述(检索日期为2015年4月至12月)。
任何护理级别;无地域限制。
糖尿病高危成年人(根据血糖测量、风险评估或危险因素的存在情况确定)。
饮食与体育活动联合干预,包括与医疗保健专业人员进行≥2次互动,以及≥12个月的随访。
主要指标:血糖、糖尿病发病率。次要指标:行为改变、肥胖指标、血管疾病和死亡率。
确定纳入19篇近期综述;5篇AMSTAR评分<8。大多数仅考虑随机对照试验(RCT),其余综述中RCT为主要数据来源。大多数综述纳入了5项试验。几乎所有分析均报告,在长达23年(通常<6年)的随访期内,干预措施与糖尿病发病率、血糖和肥胖指标的净降低相关。一些研究报告了较小的效应量和可能短暂的效应,一些综述作者指出,干预效果的持久性可能对干预持续时间和行为改变的依从性敏感。行为改变、血管疾病和死亡率结局数据报告较少,干预对这些结局影响的证据极少。年龄效应的证据不一,很少考虑性别和种族效应。
在试验条件下,相对长期的生活方式干预可限制或延缓糖尿病进展。然而,更有时限的干预措施以及在常规临床环境中应用的干预措施的结局似乎更具变异性,这与近期实用试验的结果一致。几乎没有证据表明在任何情况下干预对血管结局或死亡率终点有影响。预计糖尿病预防生活方式干预的“现实世界”实施将产生适度的效果。