Niehaus Abraham J, Mlisana Koleka, Gandhi Neel R, Mathema Barun, Brust James C M
Department of Medical Microbiology, National Health Laboratory Services and University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Departments of Epidemiology, Global Health, and Medicine, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 2;10(9):e0135003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135003. eCollection 2015.
Drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) remains extremely difficult to treat because there are often few remaining active medications and limited diagnostic options to detect resistance. Resistance to isoniazid is typically caused by mutations in either katG or the inhA promoter. inhA mutations confer low-level resistance to isoniazid and cross-resistance to ethionamide while katG mutations confer high-level isoniazid resistance and no cross-resistance. Line Probe Assays (LPAs) that detect mutations in katG and inhA are currently performed on all positive TB cultures in KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa, but the frequency of inhA mutations in drug-resistant TB patients has not been examined.
We sought to determine the proportion of patients who could potentially benefit from high-dose isoniazid and who may be resistant to ethionamide. We reviewed 994 LPA (Hain MTBDRplus) results at the TB reference laboratory in KwaZulu-Natal to determine the frequency of mutations in either katG or the inhA promoter. We stratified these results by drug-resistance category (i.e., MDR-TB, pre-XDR-TB, and XDR-TB) as determined by phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing.
Among MDR- and XDR-TB isolates, the prevalence of inhA mutations without a concurrent katG mutation was 14.8% and 10.3% respectively. The prevalence of inhA mutations with OR without a katG mutation was 30.3% and 82.8%, respectively.
More than 10% of patients with MDR- and XDR-TB may benefit from high-dose isoniazid. Although ethionamide is empirically included in all MDR- and XDR-TB regimens, nearly a third of MDR-TB patients and a majority of XDR-TB patients likely have resistance to ethionamide. Laboratories performing line probe assays should report specific band patterns so that clinicians may adjust treatment regimens accordingly.
耐多药结核病(TB)的治疗仍然极为困难,因为通常可用的有效药物很少,且检测耐药性的诊断方法有限。对异烟肼的耐药性通常由katG或inhA启动子的突变引起。inhA突变导致对异烟肼的低水平耐药以及对乙硫异烟胺的交叉耐药,而katG突变导致对异烟肼的高水平耐药且无交叉耐药。目前,南非夸祖鲁 - 纳塔尔省对所有结核阳性培养物都进行检测katG和inhA突变的线性探针分析(LPA),但耐多药结核病患者中inhA突变的频率尚未得到研究。
我们试图确定可能从高剂量异烟肼中获益且可能对乙硫异烟胺耐药的患者比例。我们回顾了夸祖鲁 - 纳塔尔省结核病参考实验室的994份LPA(海因MTBDRplus)结果,以确定katG或inhA启动子中突变的频率。我们根据表型药敏试验确定的耐药类别(即耐多药结核病、广泛耐药结核病前体和广泛耐药结核病)对这些结果进行分层。
在耐多药和广泛耐药结核分枝杆菌分离株中,无同时发生katG突变的inhA突变患病率分别为14.8%和10.3%。有或无katG突变时inhA突变的患病率分别为30.3%和82.8%。
超过10%的耐多药和广泛耐药结核病患者可能从高剂量异烟肼中获益。尽管所有耐多药和广泛耐药结核病治疗方案中都经验性地包含乙硫异烟胺,但近三分之一的耐多药结核病患者和大多数广泛耐药结核病患者可能对乙硫异烟胺耐药。进行线性探针分析的实验室应报告特定的条带模式,以便临床医生据此调整治疗方案。