• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
What do we know about developing patient portals? a systematic literature review.关于开发患者门户网站我们了解什么?一项系统的文献综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Apr;23(e1):e162-8. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv114. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
2
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
5
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.计算机和其他电子戒烟辅助手段的有效性和成本效益:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(38):1-205, iii-v. doi: 10.3310/hta16380.
7
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
8
What Matters Most? An Exploration of Quality of Life Through the Everyday Experiences of Autistic Young People and Adults.最重要的是什么?通过自闭症青少年和成年人的日常经历探索生活质量。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):312-323. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0127. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
Governance arrangements for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews.低收入国家卫生系统的治理安排:系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD011085. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011085.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Parent-Reported Usability of a Patient Portal-Based Asthma Care Tool for Parents of Children With Asthma.家长报告的基于患者门户的哮喘护理工具对哮喘患儿家长的可用性。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2025 Feb;60(2):e27509. doi: 10.1002/ppul.27509.
2
Designing an interoperable patient portal to augment an Advanced Nurse Practitioner service for Children with hydrocephalus.设计一个可互操作的患者门户,以增强针对脑积水患儿的高级执业护士服务。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Jul 8;7:100223. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100223. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Using implementation science to evaluate a population-wide genomic screening program: Findings from the first 20,000 In Our DNA SC participants.利用实施科学评估全人群基因组筛查计划:来自前 20000 名 In Our DNA SC 参与者的研究结果。
Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Mar 7;111(3):433-444. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.01.004. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
4
Multilayer framework for digital multicomponent platform design for colorectal survivors and carers: a qualitative study.多层框架用于结直肠癌幸存者和照护者的数字多组分平台设计:一项定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 5;11:1272344. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1272344. eCollection 2023.
5
Patient Portals as Facilitators of Engagement in Patients With Diabetes and Chronic Heart Disease: Scoping Review of Usage and Usability.患者门户促进糖尿病和慢性心脏疾病患者的参与:使用和可用性的范围回顾。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 25;25:e38447. doi: 10.2196/38447.
6
The State-of-the-Art of Patient Portals: Adapting to External Factors, Addressing Barriers, and Innovating.患者门户的最新进展:适应外部因素、解决障碍和创新。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Aug;14(4):654-669. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1770901. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
7
Alerts and Collections for Automating Patients' Sensemaking and Organizing of Their Electronic Health Record Data for Reflection, Planning, and Clinical Visits: Qualitative Research-Through-Design Study.用于自动促进患者对其电子健康记录数据进行意义建构、整理以便反思、规划和临床就诊的警报与信息收集:定性设计研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Aug 21;10:e41552. doi: 10.2196/41552.
8
Anticipating adaptation: tracking the impact of planned and unplanned adaptations during the implementation of a complex population-based genomic screening program.预期适应:在实施复杂的基于人群的基因组筛查计划期间,跟踪计划和非计划适应的影响。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Jun 9;13(6):381-387. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad006.
9
New Ways for Patients to Make Sense of Their Electronic Health Record Data Using the Discovery Web Application: Think-Aloud Evaluation Study.患者使用发现网络应用程序理解其电子健康记录数据的新方法:出声思考评估研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 3;7:e41346. doi: 10.2196/41346.
10
Contextual Factors That Impact the Implementation of Patient Portals With a Focus on Older People in Acute Care Hospitals: Scoping Review.影响急性护理医院患者门户网站实施的背景因素:以老年人为重点的范围审查。
JMIR Aging. 2023 Feb 3;6:e31812. doi: 10.2196/31812.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing patient portals in a fragmented healthcare system.在碎片化的医疗体系中开发患者门户。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct;84(10):835-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
2
The effect of patient portals on quality outcomes and its implications to meaningful use: a systematic review.患者门户对质量结果的影响及其对有意义使用的启示:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 10;17(2):e44. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3171.
3
Secure e-mailing between physicians and patients: transformational change in ambulatory care.医生与患者之间的安全电子邮件:门诊医疗的变革性变化。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2014 Jul-Sep;37(3):211-8. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000043.
4
How outcomes are achieved through patient portals: a realist review.患者门户实现结果的途径:一个实际主义综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):751-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002501. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
5
Developing electronic cooperation tools: a case from norwegian health care.开发电子合作工具:来自挪威医疗保健领域的一个案例
Interact J Med Res. 2013 Jun 19;2(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.2346.
6
The impact of electronic patient portals on patient care: a systematic review of controlled trials.电子患者门户对患者护理的影响:对照试验的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 26;14(6):e162. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2238.
7
Personal health records and health care utilization.个人健康记录与医疗保健利用
JAMA. 2012 Nov 21;308(19):2034-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.68169.
8
Where should electronic records for patients be stored?患者的电子记录应存储在哪里?
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Dec;81(12):821-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
9
Patient-controlled sharing of medical imaging data across unaffiliated healthcare organizations.患者控制的医疗影像数据在非关联医疗保健组织之间的共享。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):157-63. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001146. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
10
Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach.证据总结:快速综述方法的演变。
Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 10;1:10. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-10.

关于开发患者门户网站我们了解什么?一项系统的文献综述。

What do we know about developing patient portals? a systematic literature review.

作者信息

Otte-Trojel Terese, de Bont Antoinette, Rundall Thomas G, van de Klundert Joris

机构信息

Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Apr;23(e1):e162-8. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv114. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocv114
PMID:26335985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4954617/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Numerous articles have reported on the development of patient portals, including development problems and solutions. We review these articles to inform future patient portal development efforts and to provide a summary of the evidence base that can guide future research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic review of relevant literature to answer 5 questions: (1) What categories of problems related to patient portal development have been defined? (2) What causal factors have been identified by problem analysis and diagnosis? (3) What solutions have been proposed to ameliorate these causal factors? (4) Which proposed solutions have been implemented and in which organizational contexts? (5) Have implemented solutions been evaluated and what learning has been generated? Through searches on PubMed, ScienceDirect and LISTA, we included 109 articles.

RESULTS

We identified 5 main problem categories: achieving patient engagement, provider engagement, appropriate data governance, security and interoperability, and a sustainable business model. Further, we identified key factors contributing to these problems as well as solutions proposed to ameliorate them. While about half (45) of the 109 articles proposed solutions, fewer than half of these solutions (18) were implemented, and even fewer (5) were evaluated to generate learning about their effects.

DISCUSSION

Few studies systematically report on the patient portal development processes. As a result, the review does not provide an evidence base for portal development.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support a set of recommendations for advancement of the evidence base: future research should build on existing evidence, draw on principles from design sciences conveyed in the problem-solving cycle, and seek to produce evidence within various different organizational contexts.

摘要

目的

众多文章报道了患者门户网站的发展情况,包括发展中存在的问题及解决方案。我们回顾这些文章,为未来患者门户网站的开发工作提供参考,并总结可指导未来研究的证据基础。

材料与方法

我们对相关文献进行了系统综述,以回答5个问题:(1)已定义的与患者门户网站开发相关的问题类别有哪些?(2)通过问题分析和诊断确定的因果因素有哪些?(3)为改善这些因果因素提出了哪些解决方案?(4)哪些提议的解决方案已得到实施,实施的组织背景是什么?(5)已实施的解决方案是否经过评估,产生了哪些经验教训?通过在PubMed、ScienceDirect和LISTA上进行检索,我们纳入了109篇文章。

结果

我们确定了5个主要问题类别:实现患者参与、提供者参与、适当的数据治理、安全性和互操作性以及可持续的商业模式。此外,我们确定了导致这些问题的关键因素以及为改善这些问题而提出的解决方案。在109篇文章中,约一半(45篇)提出了解决方案,但这些解决方案中不到一半(18篇)得到了实施,甚至更少(5篇)经过评估以了解其效果。

讨论

很少有研究系统地报告患者门户网站的开发过程。因此,该综述并未为门户网站的开发提供证据基础。

结论

我们的研究结果支持一系列推进证据基础的建议:未来的研究应基于现有证据,借鉴解决问题循环中传达的设计科学原则,并寻求在各种不同的组织背景下产生证据。