McEvoy Claire, Wiles Louise, Bernhardsson Susanne, Grimmer Karen
International Centre for Allied Health Evidence, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Physiother Res Int. 2017 Jan;22(1). doi: 10.1002/pri.1639. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
The aim of this study is to provide a systematic overview of the past decade of literature on processes of triage for patients with spinal pain, outcomes measured and markers of effectiveness.
A systematic search of the literature with narrative synthesis of findings was conducted. Studies in English language of any design concerning spinal triage programmes for adults with acute or chronic spinal complaints were considered for inclusion. Electronic database searches were conducted in OVID, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Health Source Nursing, Scopus and Web of Science. Additional references were sourced through pearling reference lists, and expert input. Findings were synthesized descriptively.
Of 216 potentially relevant records, 21 papers (20 studies) were included. There was little commonality in triage activities/programmes and outcomes, although physiotherapists were common members of triage programmes. Positive outcomes were reported most commonly for wait times, with several studies also reporting high levels of patient and physician satisfaction. Outcomes such as surgical conversion rates and selection accuracy were less clear.
Spinal triage programmes have the potential to improve efficiency of care for outpatients with spinal complaints. The evidence gaps in health outcomes, service models and cost effectiveness should be addressed by more robust prospective research designs. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
本研究旨在对过去十年有关脊柱疼痛患者分诊流程、所测量的结果及有效性标志物的文献进行系统综述。
对文献进行系统检索,并对研究结果进行叙述性综合分析。纳入所有涉及针对患有急性或慢性脊柱疾病的成人脊柱分诊项目的英文研究。通过OVID、Medline、Embase、CINAHL、Health Source Nursing、Scopus和Web of Science进行电子数据库检索。通过对参考文献列表进行拓展检索以及专家意见获取其他参考文献。对研究结果进行描述性综合分析。
在216条潜在相关记录中,纳入了21篇论文(20项研究)。分诊活动/项目和结果几乎没有共性,尽管物理治疗师是分诊项目的常见成员。等待时间方面最常报告有积极结果,多项研究还报告患者和医生满意度较高。手术转化率和选择准确性等结果则不太明确。
脊柱分诊项目有潜力提高脊柱疾病门诊患者的护理效率。健康结果、服务模式和成本效益方面的证据空白应由更有力的前瞻性研究设计来解决。版权所有© 2015约翰·威利父子有限公司。