• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在21世纪维持疫苗信心。

Sustaining Vaccine Confidence in the 21st Century.

作者信息

Hardt Karin, Schmidt-Ott Ruprecht, Glismann Steffen, Adegbola Richard A, Meurice François P

机构信息

GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Global Scientific Affairs & Medical Education, 20 Avenue Fleming, 1300 Wavre, Belgium.

GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Global Scientific Affairs & Medical Education, Prinzregentenplatz 9, 81675 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Vaccines (Basel). 2013 Jun 24;1(3):204-24. doi: 10.3390/vaccines1030204.

DOI:10.3390/vaccines1030204
PMID:26344109
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4494231/
Abstract

Vaccination provides many health and economic benefits to individuals and society, and public support for immunization programs is generally high. However, the benefits of vaccines are often not fully valued when public discussions on vaccine safety, quality or efficacy arise, and the spread of misinformation via the internet and other media has the potential to undermine immunization programs. Factors associated with improved public confidence in vaccines include evidence-based decision-making procedures and recommendations, controlled processes for licensing and monitoring vaccine safety and effectiveness and disease surveillance. Community engagement with appropriate communication approaches for each audience is a key factor in building trust in vaccines. Vaccine safety/quality issues should be handled rapidly and transparently by informing and involving those most affected and those concerned with public health in effective ways. Openness and transparency in the exchange of information between industry and other stakeholders is also important. To maximize the safety of vaccines, and thus sustain trust in vaccines, partnerships are needed between public health sector stakeholders. Vaccine confidence can be improved through collaborations that ensure high vaccine uptake rates and that inform the public and other stakeholders of the benefits of vaccines and how vaccine safety is constantly assessed, assured and communicated.

摘要

疫苗接种为个人和社会带来诸多健康和经济效益,公众对免疫规划的支持总体较高。然而,当公众讨论疫苗安全、质量或效力时,疫苗的益处往往未得到充分重视,通过互联网和其他媒体传播的错误信息有可能破坏免疫规划。与提高公众对疫苗的信心相关的因素包括基于证据的决策程序和建议、疫苗许可及监测安全性和有效性的受控流程以及疾病监测。针对不同受众采用适当的沟通方式进行社区参与是建立对疫苗信任的关键因素。疫苗安全/质量问题应以有效方式告知并让受影响最大的人群及关注公共卫生的人群参与其中,从而迅速且透明地加以处理。行业与其他利益相关者之间信息交流的公开性和透明度也很重要。为了最大限度提高疫苗安全性,进而维持对疫苗的信任,公共卫生部门的利益相关者之间需要建立伙伴关系。通过合作可提高疫苗信心,这些合作能确保高疫苗接种率,并向公众和其他利益相关者宣传疫苗的益处以及疫苗安全性是如何持续评估、确保和传达的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a8c/4494231/52e96b711f6c/vaccines-01-00204-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a8c/4494231/db8dca14a918/vaccines-01-00204-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a8c/4494231/52e96b711f6c/vaccines-01-00204-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a8c/4494231/db8dca14a918/vaccines-01-00204-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a8c/4494231/52e96b711f6c/vaccines-01-00204-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Sustaining Vaccine Confidence in the 21st Century.在21世纪维持疫苗信心。
Vaccines (Basel). 2013 Jun 24;1(3):204-24. doi: 10.3390/vaccines1030204.
2
Addressing the vaccine confidence gap.解决疫苗信心差距问题。
Lancet. 2011 Aug 6;378(9790):526-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60678-8. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
3
Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of school nurses and personnel and associations with nonmedical immunization exemptions.学校护士及工作人员的知识、态度和信念以及与非医疗免疫豁免的关联。
Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):e552-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.e552.
4
Building confidence in vaccines.建立疫苗信心。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;764:81-98. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4726-9_6.
5
Vaccine safety in the next decade: why we need new modes of trust building.未来十年的疫苗安全:为何我们需要建立信任的新模式。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 May;6(Suppl 2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003908.
6
The effect of a short, animated story-based video on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A study protocol for an online randomized controlled trial.短篇动画故事类视频对 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫的影响:一项在线随机对照试验研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 23;10:939227. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.939227. eCollection 2022.
7
Informing vaccine decision-making: A strategic multi-attribute ranking tool for vaccines-SMART Vaccines 2.0.为疫苗决策提供信息:一种用于疫苗的战略性多属性排序工具——智能疫苗2.0
Vaccine. 2017 Jan 20;35 Suppl 1:A43-A45. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.10.086. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
8
The State of Vaccine Confidence 2016: Global Insights Through a 67-Country Survey.2016 年疫苗信心状况:67 个国家调查的全球观点。
EBioMedicine. 2016 Oct;12:295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.08.042. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
9
Bringing the social into vaccination research: Community-led ethnography and trust-building in immunization programs in Sierra Leone.将社会因素纳入疫苗研究:塞拉利昂免疫项目中的社区主导民族志和建立信任。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 22;16(10):e0258252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258252. eCollection 2021.
10
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of an Arabic tool for assessment of post-vaccination confidence in COVID-19 vaccines (ARAB-VAX-CONF).用于评估 COVID-19 疫苗接种后信心的阿拉伯语工具(ARAB-VAX-CONF)的开发与验证
J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2024 Nov 18;99(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s42506-024-00174-8.
2
Vaccine confidence mediates the association between a pro-social pay-it-forward intervention and improved influenza vaccine uptake in China: A mediation analysis.疫苗信心在亲社会的“疫苗接种向前”干预与中国流感疫苗接种率提高之间起中介作用: 中介分析。
Vaccine. 2024 Jan 12;42(2):362-368. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.11.046. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Andrew Witty: the acceptable face of big pharma? Interviewed by Rebecca Coombes.安德鲁·惠蒂:大型制药公司的可接受面孔?丽贝卡·库姆斯采访
BMJ. 2013 Mar 6;346:f1458. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1458.
2
Effect of rotavirus vaccine on diarrhea mortality in different socioeconomic regions of Mexico.轮状病毒疫苗对墨西哥不同社会经济地区腹泻死亡率的影响。
Pediatrics. 2013 Apr;131(4):e1115-20. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2797. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
3
Rotavirus vaccines. WHO position paper – January 2013.轮状病毒疫苗。世界卫生组织立场文件 – 2013年1月
Preventable Disease, the Case of Colorado: School District Demographics and Childhood Immunizations.
可预防疾病:科罗拉多州的情况——学区人口统计与儿童免疫接种
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Sep 21;10(10):1579. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10101579.
4
Vaccination coverage determinants in low uptake areas of China: a qualitative study of provider perspectives in Sichuan, Guangdong, and Henan Provinces.中国低接种地区疫苗接种覆盖率的决定因素:对四川、广东和河南省提供者观点的定性研究。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Dec 31;18(1):2030623. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2030623. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
5
The Credibility of Health Information Sources as Predictors of Attitudes toward Vaccination-The Results from a Longitudinal Study in Poland.健康信息来源的可信度作为疫苗接种态度预测因素——波兰一项纵向研究的结果
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Aug 23;9(8):933. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9080933.
6
The intent of students to vaccinate is influenced by cultural factors, peer network, and knowledge about vaccines.学生的疫苗接种意愿受到文化因素、同伴网络和疫苗知识的影响。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Dec 31;18(1):1938492. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1938492. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
7
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2021 May 12;45:e50. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2021.50. eCollection 2021.
8
Using a Global Pandemic as a Teachable Moment to Promote Vaccine Literacy and Build Resilience to Misinformation.利用全球大流行作为一个教育契机,以促进疫苗知识普及并增强对错误信息的抵御能力。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Oct;110(S3):S284-S285. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305906.
9
Vaccine confidence in China after the Changsheng vaccine incident: a cross-sectional study.长春长生疫苗事件后中国民众的疫苗信心:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):1564. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7945-0.
10
Vaccine Safety and Surveillance for Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) in India.印度疫苗接种后不良反应(AEFI)的安全性和监测。
Indian J Pediatr. 2018 Feb;85(2):139-148. doi: 10.1007/s12098-017-2532-9. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2013 Feb 1;88(5):49-64.
4
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended immunization schedule for adults aged 19 years and older--United States, 2013.美国免疫实施咨询委员会(ACIP)2013年推荐的19岁及以上成年人免疫接种时间表
MMWR Suppl. 2013 Feb 1;62(1):9-19.
5
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended immunization schedule for persons aged 0 through 18 years--United States, 2013.美国免疫实践咨询委员会(ACIP)2013年针对0至18岁人群的推荐免疫接种时间表
MMWR Suppl. 2013 Feb 1;62(1):2-8.
6
A population-based cohort study of undervaccination in 8 managed care organizations across the United States.一项针对美国 8 家管理式医疗组织中疫苗接种不足的基于人群的队列研究。
JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Mar 1;167(3):274-81. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.502.
7
About courageous scientists, responsible policy makers, bridge-builders and preparedness for the next influenza pandemic.关于勇敢的科学家、负责任的政策制定者、桥梁搭建者以及对下一次流感大流行的防范。
Vaccine. 2012 Dec 7;30(51):7437-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.09.073.
8
Industry sponsorship and research outcome.行业赞助与研究成果。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:MR000033. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub2.
9
Implementation of human papillomavirus immunization in the developing world.发展中国家实施人乳头瘤病毒疫苗免疫接种。
Vaccine. 2012 Nov 20;30 Suppl 5:F192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.075.
10
Upgrading public health programs for human papillomavirus prevention and control is possible in low- and middle-income countries.在中低收入国家,升级人乳头瘤病毒预防和控制的公共卫生项目是可行的。
Vaccine. 2012 Nov 20;30 Suppl 5:F183-91. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.031.