Waggoner Jesse J, Okangba Chika, Mohamed-Hadley Alisha, Lefterova Martina I, Banaei Niaz, Oyibo Wellington, Pinsky Benjamin A
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Lagos College of Medicine, Lagos, Nigeria.
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Nov;53(11):3596-600. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01876-15. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
Plasmodium nucleic acids have been detected in serum and plasma, but there is little published data describing the diagnostic performance of malaria nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) using these specimen types. Previously, our group described a multiplex NAAT for the detection of dengue virus, Leptospira, and Plasmodium species with a callout for P. falciparum (the DLM assay) that demonstrated sensitive detection of P. falciparum from plasma samples during initial evaluation. In this study, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of P. falciparum detection in febrile Nigerian patients using the DLM assay, microscopy, and a rapid diagnostic test (BinaxNOW Malaria). Assay performances were compared using a composite reference, which was considered positive if malaria was detected by two or more methods. Serum (n = 182) or plasma (n = 148) from 317 patients was tested; the average sample volume was 70 μl (range, 5 to 300 μl). The sensitivity and specificity of the DLM assay were 97.1% and 93.5%, respectively. The sensitivity of the malaria rapid diagnostic test (98.1%) was similar to that of the DLM assay, and both proved significantly more sensitive than microscopy (79%; P < 0.0001). When analysis was limited to samples with ≥75 μl of serum or plasma, the sensitivity of the DLM assay improved to 99% and specificity was 97.5%. For P. falciparum cases, cycle threshold values in the DLM assay correlated with the parasite density detected by microscopy (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, malaria detection using the DLM assay on serum or plasma is more sensitive than and equal in specificity to microscopy in patients with P. falciparum malaria.
已在血清和血浆中检测到疟原虫核酸,但关于使用这些样本类型的疟疾核酸扩增试验(NAAT)诊断性能的公开数据很少。此前,我们团队描述了一种用于检测登革病毒、钩端螺旋体和疟原虫物种的多重NAAT,并对恶性疟原虫进行了标注(DLM检测法),该方法在初步评估期间显示出从血浆样本中灵敏检测恶性疟原虫的能力。在本研究中,我们使用DLM检测法、显微镜检查和快速诊断试验(BinaxNOW疟疾检测)评估了发热尼日利亚患者中恶性疟原虫检测的敏感性和特异性。使用综合参考标准比较检测方法的性能,如果通过两种或更多方法检测到疟疾,则认为该标准为阳性。对317名患者的血清(n = 182)或血浆(n = 148)进行了检测;平均样本量为70μl(范围为5至300μl)。DLM检测法的敏感性和特异性分别为97.1%和93.5%。疟疾快速诊断试验的敏感性(98.1%)与DLM检测法相似,且两者均比显微镜检查显著更灵敏(79%;P < 0.0001)。当分析仅限于血清或血浆≥75μl的样本时,DLM检测法的敏感性提高到99%,特异性为97.5%。对于恶性疟原虫病例,DLM检测法中的循环阈值与显微镜检查检测到的寄生虫密度相关(Spearman等级相关系数,P < 0.0001)。总之,在恶性疟原虫疟疾患者中,使用DLM检测法检测血清或血浆中的疟疾比显微镜检查更灵敏,特异性相当。