Ying Fong Yoly Yeuk, Yu Marco, Young Alvin Lerrmann, Jhanji Vishal
From the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Prince of Wales Hospital (YYYF, ALY, VJ); Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (MY, ALY, VJ); Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Hang Seng Management College, Hong Kong (MY); and Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (VJ).
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(36):e1518-0. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001518.
We compared the clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of corneal and scleral perforations in geriatric nursing home residents, geriatric community residents, and non-geriatric population. The medical records of patients who were treated for corneal and scleral perforations at the Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong between January 1, 2004 and May 1, 2013, were reviewed retrospectively. Of 144 cases, 53 (37%) occurred in the geriatric population, of which 16 (11%) lived in nursing homes, and 37 (26%) were community residents. There were 91 (63%) patients in the non-geriatric group. The mean age of the patients in nursing home geriatric group was 86.5 years (87.5% females). The most common etiology of perforation was trauma. Rupture due to fall was more common in geriatric patients (P < 0.001) whereas laceration due to penetrating eye injury was more common in non-geriatric patients (P < 0.001). There were more cases of infection leading to spontaneous perforation in geriatric nursing home group compared to the other groups (P = 0.001). In the geriatric nursing home group, visual acuity at presentation (P < 0.001) and postoperative visual acuity (P = 0.012) was worse compared to the other groups. Our study showed that corneal and scleral perforations in the geriatric nursing home residents carry a poor visual prognosis. The causes and anatomical outcomes of such events in geriatric age group differ from those in the general population. In our study, geriatric patients residing in nursing homes had worse baseline as well as posttreatment visual acuity, compared to community residents.
我们比较了老年疗养院居民、老年社区居民和非老年人群角膜穿孔和巩膜穿孔的临床表现及治疗结果。回顾性分析了2004年1月1日至2013年5月1日期间在香港威尔士亲王医院接受角膜穿孔和巩膜穿孔治疗的患者的病历。144例病例中,53例(37%)发生在老年人群中,其中16例(11%)居住在疗养院,37例(26%)为社区居民。非老年组有91例(63%)患者。疗养院老年组患者的平均年龄为86.5岁(女性占87.5%)。穿孔最常见的病因是外伤。老年患者因跌倒导致的破裂更为常见(P<0.001),而非老年患者因穿透性眼外伤导致的撕裂更为常见(P<0.001)。与其他组相比,老年疗养院组因感染导致自发性穿孔的病例更多(P=0.001)。在老年疗养院组中,就诊时的视力(P<0.001)和术后视力(P=0.012)比其他组更差。我们的研究表明,老年疗养院居民的角膜穿孔和巩膜穿孔视力预后较差。老年人群中此类事件的病因和解剖学结果与一般人群不同。在我们的研究中,与社区居民相比,居住在疗养院的老年患者基线视力和治疗后视力更差。