Department of Physiotherapy, School of Therapeutic Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 7 York Road, Parktown, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
Sports Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sports Med. 2016 Jan;46(1):79-101. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0383-y.
BACKGROUND: The high prevalence of injury amongst cricket fast bowlers exposes a great need for research into the risk factors associated with injury. Both extrinsic (environment-related) and intrinsic (person-related) risk factors are likely to be implicated within the high prevalence of non-contact injury amongst fast bowlers in cricket. Identifying and defining the relative importance of these risk factors is necessary in order to optimize injury prevention efforts. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to assess and summarize the scientific literature related to the extrinsic and intrinsic factors associated with non-contact injury inherent to adult cricket fast bowlers. METHOD: A systematic review was performed in compliance with the PRISMA guidelines. This review considered both experimental and epidemiological study designs. Studies that included male cricket fast bowlers aged 18 years or above, from all levels of play, evaluating the association between extrinsic/intrinsic factors and injury in fast bowlers were considered for inclusion. The three-step search strategy aimed at finding both published and unpublished studies from all languages. The searched databases included MEDLINE via PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register in the Cochrane Library, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), ProQuest 5000 International, ProQuest Health and Medical Complete, EBSCO MegaFile Premier, Science Direct, SPORTDiscus with Full Text and SCOPUS (prior to 28 April 2015). Initial keywords used were 'cricket', 'pace', 'fast', 'bowler', and 'injury'. Papers which fitted the inclusion criteria were assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI). RESULTS: A total of 16 studies were determined to be suitable for inclusion in this systematic review. The mean critical appraisal score of the papers included in this study was 6.88 (SD 1.15) out of a maximum of 9. The following factors were found to be associated with injury: bowling shoulder internal rotation strength deficit, compromised dynamic balance and lumbar proprioception (joint position sense), the appearance of lumbar posterior element bone stress, degeneration of the lumbar disc on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and previous injury. Conflicting results were found for the association of quadratus lumborum (QL) muscle asymmetry with injury. Technique-related factors associated with injury included shoulder-pelvis flexion-extension angle, shoulder counter-rotation, knee angle, and the proportion of side-flexion during bowling. Bowling workload was the only extrinsic factor associated with injury in adult cricket fast bowlers. A high bowling workload (particularly if it represented a sudden upgrade from a lower workload) increased the subsequent risk to sustaining an injury 1, 3 or 4 weeks later. CONCLUSION: Identifying the factors associated with injury is a crucial step which should precede the development of, and research into, the effectiveness of injury prevention programs. Once identified, risk factors may be included in pre-participation screening tools and injury prevention programs, and may also be incorporated in future research projects. Overall, the current review highlights the clear lack of research on factors associated with non-contact injury, specifically in adult cricket fast bowlers. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: Johanna Briggs Institute Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports 1387 (Olivier et al., JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Rep 13(1):3-13. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1387 , 2015).
背景:板球快速投球手中高频率的受伤率表明,需要对与受伤相关的风险因素进行研究。外在(与环境相关)和内在(与人相关)的风险因素都可能与板球快速投球手中高发的非接触性受伤有关。确定并定义这些风险因素的相对重要性,对于优化预防受伤的努力是必要的。
目的:本综述的目的是评估和总结与成人板球快速投球手固有非接触性受伤相关的外在和内在因素的科学文献。
方法:按照 PRISMA 指南进行系统综述。本综述考虑了实验和流行病学研究设计。包括年龄在 18 岁或以上、来自所有比赛水平的男性板球快速投球手,评估外在/内在因素与快速投球手受伤之间的关系的研究都被认为是合适的纳入对象。三步骤搜索策略旨在从所有语言中找到已发表和未发表的研究。搜索的数据库包括 MEDLINE 通过 PubMed、Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)、Cochrane 图书馆中的 Cochrane 对照试验登记处、Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro)、ProQuest 5000 International、ProQuest Health and Medical Complete、EBSCO MegaFile Premier、Science Direct、SPORTDiscus with Full Text 和 SCOPUS(截至 2015 年 4 月 28 日)。最初使用的关键词是“板球”、“投球”、“快速”、“投球手”和“受伤”。符合纳入标准的论文由两名独立评审员使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所的 Meta 分析统计评估和审查工具(JBI-MAStARI)进行方法学有效性评估,然后纳入综述。
结果:共确定了 16 项研究适合纳入本系统综述。本研究纳入的论文的平均批判性评估得分为 6.88(SD 1.15),满分 9 分。与受伤相关的因素包括:投球肩内旋力量不足、动态平衡和腰椎本体感觉(关节位置感)受损、腰椎后元素骨应激的出现、腰椎间盘在磁共振成像(MRI)上的退变以及既往受伤。QL 肌肉不对称与受伤的关联存在相互矛盾的结果。与受伤相关的技术因素包括肩骨盆屈伸角度、肩反向旋转、膝关节角度和投球时的侧屈比例。投球工作量是与成人板球快速投球手受伤相关的唯一外在因素。高投球工作量(特别是如果突然从低工作量升级)会增加随后受伤的风险,无论是 1 周、3 周还是 4 周后。
结论:确定与受伤相关的因素是制定和研究预防受伤方案之前的关键步骤。一旦确定,风险因素可以纳入参与前筛查工具和预防受伤方案中,也可以纳入未来的研究项目中。总的来说,目前的综述突出了与非接触性受伤相关的因素的研究明显缺乏,特别是在成人板球快速投球手中。
系统评价注册号:乔安娜·布里格斯研究所系统评价和实施报告数据库 1387(Olivier 等人,JBI 数据库系统评价实施报告 13(1):3-13。doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1387,2015 年)。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016-4
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015-1
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016-2
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-9-19
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023-9-20
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022-9-2
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2022-8-2
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2021-9-10
Sports Med. 2018-11
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015-1
Br J Sports Med. 2015-3-9
J Sci Med Sport. 2015-1
Br J Sports Med. 2013-8-20
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013-6
Br J Sports Med. 2013-5-10