Lacharité-Lemieux Marianne, Dionne Isabelle J
Faculty of Physical Activity Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
J Aging Phys Act. 2016 Apr;24(2):275-83. doi: 10.1123/japa.2015-0019. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
Chronic effects of two different exercise environments on self-chosen intensity and physiological adaptations were examined in postmenopausal women. Twenty-three healthy to overweight (body mass index [BMI] 22-29 kg/m2) postmenopausal women performed three weekly training sessions during 12 weeks and were assigned to either: (1) indoor training or (2) outdoor training. Body composition, metabolic profile, and physical fitness (including Vo2max, maximal strength, and endurance) were assessed pre- and postintervention. Exercise intensity was measured every week during the training. Maximum intensity decreased significantly in time only in outdoor training (p ≤ .05). Body composition and VO2max were significantly improved indoors (p ≤ .05), whereas resting blood pressure and upper body maximal strength and endurance were improved outdoors (p ≤ .05). Indoor training is associated with maintaining intensity over time and slightly higher physiological improvements than outdoor training. However, outdoor training seems promising from a long-term perspective, due to its positive effects on health parameters and exercise adherence.
研究了两种不同运动环境对绝经后女性自主选择运动强度和生理适应性的慢性影响。23名健康至超重(体重指数[BMI]为22 - 29kg/m²)的绝经后女性在12周内每周进行三次训练课程,并被分为两组:(1)室内训练组或(2)室外训练组。在干预前后评估身体成分、代谢状况和身体素质(包括最大摄氧量、最大力量和耐力)。在训练期间每周测量运动强度。仅在室外训练中,最大强度随时间显著降低(p≤0.05)。室内训练使身体成分和最大摄氧量显著改善(p≤0.05),而室外训练使静息血压、上身最大力量和耐力得到改善(p≤0.05)。室内训练与随着时间推移保持运动强度相关,并且生理改善略高于室外训练。然而,从长期来看,室外训练似乎很有前景,因为它对健康参数和运动依从性有积极影响。