Pain Tilley, Plummer David, Pighills Alison, Harvey Desley
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Molecular Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Townsville Hospital and Health Service, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Aust J Rural Health. 2015 Oct;23(5):277-85. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12234. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
We compared the research experience or support needs of allied health professionals in rural versus regional cities to identify if they were the same or different.
Descriptive study using a cross sectional survey.
This study was carried within Queensland Health's northern six health services.
Queensland health staff classified as Health Practitioners.
This survey was conducted as part of a research capacity building initiative within Queensland Health to increase AHPs' participation in research in regional cities and rural areas of Queensland.
Questions in the survey identified demographics, research experience, need for research support, research knowledge and beliefs about research. Data were compared using Chi-square and t-tests.
The total response rate was 54.5% with 18% of the HPs located in rural communities of less than 5000 people and the rest from the three major cities in northern Queensland. Rural HPs have less research experience in most research activities than regional city HPs and need more research support. Rural HPs have more qualitative research experience than regional city HPs and research is perceived positively by both. Barriers to conducting research were similar across both groups and included insufficient time, lack of staff and no statistical support.
Rural HPs are younger and have less research experience than their counterparts working in regional cities. Therefore, building rural HP research capacity initiatives may require more access to facilitators such as the Research Fellows.
我们比较了农村地区与区域城市的专职医疗人员的研究经历或支持需求,以确定它们是否相同或不同。
采用横断面调查的描述性研究。
本研究在昆士兰卫生部门的北部六个卫生服务机构内进行。
昆士兰卫生部门归类为健康从业者的工作人员。
本次调查是昆士兰卫生部门研究能力建设倡议的一部分,目的是增加专职医疗人员参与昆士兰区域城市和农村地区的研究。
调查中的问题确定了人口统计学、研究经历、研究支持需求、研究知识以及对研究的看法。使用卡方检验和t检验对数据进行比较。
总回复率为54.5%,其中18%的健康从业者位于人口不足5000人的农村社区,其余来自昆士兰北部的三个主要城市。农村地区的健康从业者在大多数研究活动中的研究经历比区域城市的健康从业者少,并且需要更多的研究支持。农村地区的健康从业者比区域城市的健康从业者有更多的定性研究经历,并且两者对研究的看法都是积极的。两组进行研究的障碍相似,包括时间不足、人员短缺和缺乏统计支持。
农村地区的健康从业者比在区域城市工作的同行更年轻,研究经历更少。因此,建设农村健康从业者研究能力的倡议可能需要更多地接触诸如研究员之类 的促进者。