Hyldmo Per Kristian, Vist Gunn E, Feyling Anders Christian, Rognås Leif, Magnusson Vidar, Sandberg Mårten, Søreide Eldar
Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Department of Research and Development, Drøbak, Norway.
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Sep 17;23:65. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0143-x.
Airway protection and spinal precautions are competing concerns in the treatment of unconscious trauma patients. The placement of such patients in a lateral position may facilitate the acquisition of an adequate airway. However, trauma dogma dictates that patients should be transported in the supine position to minimize spinal movement. In this systematic review, we sought to answer the following question: Given an existing spinal injury, will changing a patient's position from supine to lateral increase the risk of neurological deterioration?
The review protocol was published in the PROSPERO database (Reg. no. CRD42012001190). We performed literature searches in PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL and the British Nursing Index and included studies of traumatic spinal injury, lateral positioning and neurological deterioration. The search was updated prior to submission. Two researchers independently completed each step in the review process.
We identified 1,164 publications. However, none of these publications reported mortality or neurological deterioration with lateral positioning as an outcome measure. Twelve studies used movement of the injured spine with lateral positioning as an outcome measure; eleven of these investigations were cadaver studies. All of these cadaver studies reported spinal movement during lateral positioning. The only identified human study included eighteen patients with thoracic or lumbar spinal fractures; according to the study authors, the logrolling technique did not result in any neurological deterioration among these patients.
We identified no clinical studies demonstrating that rotating trauma patients from the supine position to a lateral position affects mortality or causes neurological deterioration. However, in various cadaver models, this type of rotation did produce statistically significant displacements of the injured spine. The clinical significance of these cadaver-based observations remains unclear. The present evidence for harm in rotating trauma patients from the supine position to a lateral position, including the logroll maneuver, is inconclusive.
气道保护和脊柱防护是昏迷创伤患者治疗中相互冲突的关注点。将此类患者置于侧卧位可能有助于建立足够的气道。然而,创伤治疗原则规定患者应仰卧位运送以尽量减少脊柱移动。在这项系统评价中,我们试图回答以下问题:在已有脊柱损伤的情况下,将患者体位从仰卧位改为侧卧位会增加神经功能恶化的风险吗?
该评价方案已发表于PROSPERO数据库(注册号CRD42012001190)。我们在PubMed、Medline、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、CINAHL和英国护理索引中进行了文献检索,纳入了关于创伤性脊柱损伤、侧卧位摆放和神经功能恶化的研究。在提交前更新了检索。两位研究人员独立完成评价过程的每一步。
我们识别出1164篇出版物。然而,这些出版物均未将侧卧位摆放导致的死亡率或神经功能恶化作为结局指标进行报道。12项研究将侧卧位摆放时受伤脊柱的移动作为结局指标;其中11项研究为尸体研究。所有这些尸体研究均报道了侧卧位摆放时的脊柱移动。唯一一项纳入的人体研究包括18例胸腰椎骨折患者;据研究作者称,在这些患者中,滚动法并未导致任何神经功能恶化。
我们未发现临床研究表明将创伤患者从仰卧位转为侧卧位会影响死亡率或导致神经功能恶化。然而,在各种尸体模型中,这种类型的转动确实使受伤脊柱产生了具有统计学意义的移位。这些基于尸体观察的临床意义尚不清楚。目前关于将创伤患者从仰卧位转为侧卧位(包括滚动法)有害的证据尚无定论。