Gaul Charly, Diener Hans-Christoph, Silver Nicholas, Magis Delphine, Reuter Uwe, Andersson Annelie, Liebler Eric J, Straube Andreas
Migraine and Headache Clinic, Königstein, Germany
Department of Neurology, University Hospital-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Cephalalgia. 2016 May;36(6):534-46. doi: 10.1177/0333102415607070. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
BACKGROUND: Chronic cluster headache (CH) is a debilitating disorder for which few well-controlled studies demon.strate effectiveness of available therapies. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) was examined as adjunctive prophylactic treatment of chronic CH. METHODS: PREVA was a prospective, open-label, randomised study that compared adjunctive prophylactic nVNS (n = 48) with standard of care (SoC) alone (control (n = 49)). A two-week baseline phase was followed by a four-week randomised phase (SoC plus nVNS vs control) and a four-week extension phase (SoC plus nVNS). The primary end point was the reduction in the mean number of CH attacks per week. Response rate, abortive medication use and safety/tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: During the randomised phase, individuals in the intent-to-treat population treated with SoC plus nVNS (n = 45) had a significantly greater reduction in the number of attacks per week vs controls (n = 48) (-5.9 vs -2.1, respectively) for a mean therapeutic gain of 3.9 fewer attacks per week (95% CI: 0.5, 7.2; p = 0.02). Higher ≥50% response rates were also observed with SoC plus nVNS (40% (18/45)) vs controls (8.3% (4/48); p < 0.001). No serious treatment-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive prophylactic nVNS is a well-tolerated novel treatment for chronic CH, offering clinical benefits beyond those with SoC.
背景:慢性丛集性头痛(CH)是一种使人衰弱的疾病,很少有严格对照研究证明现有疗法的有效性。非侵入性迷走神经刺激(nVNS)被作为慢性CH的辅助预防性治疗进行研究。 方法:PREVA是一项前瞻性、开放标签、随机研究,将辅助预防性nVNS(n = 48)与单纯标准治疗(SoC)(对照组,n = 49)进行比较。为期两周的基线期之后是为期四周的随机期(SoC加nVNS与对照组)和为期四周的延长期(SoC加nVNS)。主要终点是每周CH发作平均次数的减少。还评估了缓解率、急救药物使用情况以及安全性/耐受性。 结果:在随机期,接受SoC加nVNS治疗的意向性治疗人群个体(n = 45)每周发作次数的减少幅度显著大于对照组(n = 48)(分别为-5.9次与-2.1次),平均每周治疗获益为发作次数减少3.9次(95%CI:0.5,7.2;p = 0.02)。SoC加nVNS组的缓解率≥50%也更高(40%(18/45)),而对照组为8.3%(4/48);p < 0.001)。未发生严重的治疗相关不良事件。 结论:辅助预防性nVNS是一种耐受性良好的慢性CH新疗法,与SoC相比具有更多临床益处。
J Headache Pain. 2018-11-23
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2025-5-1
Pain Pract. 2025-6
J Headache Pain. 2025-5-19
Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2025-2-14
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025-2-15
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2024-12-3
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025-1-7
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-7-17
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2013-7-3
BMJ. 2012-4-11