Suppr超能文献

非侵入性迷走神经刺激治疗丛集性头痛:英国早期临床经验。

Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of cluster headache: early UK clinical experience.

机构信息

Wellcome Foundation Building, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.

Royal United Hospital, Coombe Park, Bath, BA1 3NG, UK.

出版信息

J Headache Pain. 2018 Nov 23;19(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0936-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence supports the use of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS; gammaCore®) as a promising therapeutic option for patients with cluster headache (CH). We conducted this audit of real-world data from patients with CH, the majority of whom were treatment refractory, to explore early UK clinical experience with nVNS used acutely, preventively, or both.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed data from 30 patients with CH (29 chronic, 1 episodic) who submitted individual funding requests for nVNS to the National Health Service. All patients had responded to adjunctive nVNS therapy during an evaluation period (typical duration, 3-6 months). Data collected from patient interviews, treatment diaries, and physician notes were summarised with descriptive statistics. Paired t tests were used to examine statistical significance.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) CH attack frequency decreased from 26.6 (17.1) attacks/wk. before initiation of nVNS therapy to 9.5 (11.0) attacks/wk. (P < 0.01) afterward. Mean (SD) attack duration decreased from 51.9 (36.7) minutes to 29.4 (28.5) minutes (P < 0.01), and mean (SD) attack severity (rated on a 10-point scale) decreased from 7.8 (2.3) to 6.0 (2.6) (P < 0.01). Use of abortive treatments also decreased. Favourable changes in the use of preventive medication were also observed. No serious device-related adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant decreases in attack frequency, severity, and duration were observed in these patients with CH who did not respond to or were intolerant of multiple preventive and/or acute treatments. These real-world findings complement evidence from clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy and safety of nVNS in CH.

摘要

背景

有证据支持使用非侵入性迷走神经刺激(nVNS;gammaCore®)作为治疗丛集性头痛(CH)患者的一种有前途的治疗选择。我们对大多数治疗抵抗的 CH 患者进行了这项真实世界数据的审计,以探索急性、预防性或两者兼用 nVNS 的英国早期临床经验。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 30 名 CH 患者(29 名慢性,1 名发作性)的个人资金请求数据,这些患者向国民保健服务提交了 nVNS 请求。所有患者在评估期间(典型持续时间为 3-6 个月)对辅助 nVNS 治疗有反应。从患者访谈、治疗日记和医生记录中收集的数据进行描述性统计。使用配对 t 检验检验统计学意义。

结果

CH 发作频率从 nVNS 治疗开始前的 26.6(17.1)次/周降低至治疗后的 9.5(11.0)次/周(P < 0.01)。发作持续时间从 51.9(36.7)分钟降低至 29.4(28.5)分钟(P < 0.01),发作严重程度(10 分制评分)从 7.8(2.3)降低至 6.0(2.6)(P < 0.01)。也减少了发作时的急救治疗。预防性药物的使用也出现了有利的变化。未报告严重的设备相关不良事件。

结论

在对多种预防性和/或急性治疗无反应或不耐受的 CH 患者中,观察到发作频率、严重程度和持续时间的显著降低。这些真实世界的发现补充了临床试验中 nVNS 在 CH 中的疗效和安全性的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddab/6755582/7648053c9c8a/10194_2018_936_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验