Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Jubilee Campus, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU UK.
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2015 Sep 17;2:12. doi: 10.1186/s40479-015-0033-x. eCollection 2015.
Despite a well-documented association between personality disorders (PDs) and violence, the relationship between them is complicated by the high comorbidity of mental disorders, the heterogeneity of violence (particularly in regard to its motivation), and differing views regarding the way PDs are conceptualised and measured. In particular, it remains unclear whether there is a causal relationship between PDs and violence, and what the psychological mechanisms might be that mediate such a relationship. Here, a perspective on PD and violence is offered that views the relationship between them through the lenses of the Five Factor Model of personality and a quadripartite typology of violence. Evidence is reviewed suggesting that emotion dysregulation/impulsiveness, psychopathy, and delusional ideation conjointly contribute to the increased risk of violence shown by people with PD, and do so by contributing to a broad severity dimension of personality dysfunction. This view is consistent with the abandonment of personality disorder categories in the forthcoming eleventh edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), where severity of personality disorder is defined in terms of the degree of harm to self and others.
尽管人格障碍(PD)与暴力之间存在明确的关联,但由于精神障碍的高共病率、暴力的异质性(特别是在其动机方面)以及对 PD 的概念化和测量方式的不同观点,它们之间的关系很复杂。特别是,PD 和暴力之间是否存在因果关系,以及可能介导这种关系的心理机制是什么,目前仍不清楚。在这里,通过人格的五因素模型和暴力的四分体型分类的视角来提供 PD 和暴力之间的关系的观点。有证据表明,情绪失调/冲动、精神病态和妄想观念共同导致 PD 患者暴力风险增加,并且通过对人格功能障碍的广泛严重程度维度做出贡献来导致这种情况。这种观点与即将发布的《国际疾病分类》第 11 版(ICD-11)中放弃人格障碍类别相一致,其中人格障碍的严重程度是根据对自己和他人的伤害程度来定义的。