Crego Cristina, Gore Whitney L, Rojas Stephanie L, Widiger Thomas A
Department of Psychology.
Personal Disord. 2015 Oct;6(4):321-35. doi: 10.1037/per0000118. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
A considerable body of research has rapidly accumulated with respect to the validity of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5) dimensional trait model as it is assessed by the Personality Inventory for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (PID-5; Krueger et al., 2012). This research though has not focused specifically on discriminant validity, although allusions to potentially problematic discriminant validity have been raised. The current study addressed discriminant validity, reporting for the first time the correlations among the PID-5 domain scales. Also reported are the bivariate correlations of the 25 PID-5 maladaptive trait scales with the personality domain scales of the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (Costa & McCrae, 1992), the International Personality Item Pool-NEO (Goldberg et al., 2006), the Inventory of Personal Characteristics (Almagor et al., 1995), the 5-Dimensional Personality Test (van Kampen, 2012), and the HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised (Lee & Ashton, 2004). The results are discussed with respect to the implications of and alternative explanations for potentially problematic discriminant validity. (PsycINFO Database Record
关于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》（第5版；DSM - 5）维度特质模型的有效性，已有大量研究迅速积累，这些研究通过《精神疾病诊断与统计手册人格问卷》（PID - 5；Krueger等人，2012）进行评估。然而，尽管有研究提及了潜在存在问题的区分效度，但这项研究并未专门聚焦于区分效度。当前的研究探讨了区分效度，首次报告了PID - 5领域量表之间的相关性。还报告了25个PID - 5适应不良特质量表与《NEO人格问卷修订版》（Costa和McCrae，1992）、《国际人格项目池 - NEO》（Goldberg等人，2006）、《个人特征量表》（Almagor等人，1995）、《五维人格测验》（van Kampen，2012）以及《HEXACO人格问卷修订版》（Lee和Ashton，2004）的人格领域量表之间的双变量相关性。研究结果将根据潜在存在问题的区分效度的影响和替代解释进行讨论。（PsycINFO数据库记录）
