Morrow Jane, Biggs Laura, Stelfox Sara, Phillips Diane, McKellar Lois, McLachlan Helen
National Course coordinator of Midwifery, Australian Catholic University, Australia School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, 17 Young Street, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia.
La Trobe University, Judith Lumley Centre, Franklin Street, Melbourne 3000, Australia.
Women Birth. 2016 Feb;29(1):85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
Assessment of clinical competence is a core component of midwifery education. Clinical assessment tools have been developed to help increase consistency and overcome subjectivity of assessment.
The study had two main aims. The first was to explore midwifery students and educators/clinical midwives' views and experiences of a common clinical assessment tool used for all preregistration midwifery programmes in Victoria and the University of South Australia. The second was to assess the need for changes to the tool to align with developments in clinical practice and evidence-based care.
A cross-sectional, web-based survey including Likert-type scales and open-ended questions was utilised.
Students enrolled in all four entry pathways to midwifery at seven Victorian and one South Australian university and educators/clinical midwives across both states.
One hundred and ninety-one midwifery students' and 86 educators/clinical midwives responded. Overall, students and educators/clinical midwives were positive about the Clinical Assessment Tool with over 90% reporting that it covered the necessary midwifery skills. Students and educators/clinical midwives reported high levels of satisfaction with the content of the learning tools. Only 4% of educators/clinical midwives and 6% of students rated the Clinical Assessment Tool as poor overall. Changes to some learning tools were necessary in order to reflect recent practice and evidence.
A common clinical assessment tool for evaluating midwifery students' clinical practice may facilitate the provision of consistent, reliable and objective assessment of student skills and competency.
临床能力评估是助产士教育的核心组成部分。已开发出临床评估工具以帮助提高评估的一致性并克服评估的主观性。
该研究有两个主要目的。第一个目的是探讨助产专业学生以及教育工作者/临床助产士对于一种用于维多利亚州和南澳大利亚大学所有预注册助产士课程的通用临床评估工具的看法和体验。第二个目的是评估是否需要对该工具进行修改,以使其与临床实践和循证护理的发展保持一致。
采用了一项基于网络的横断面调查,其中包括李克特量表和开放式问题。
维多利亚州七所大学和南澳大利亚一所大学中所有四种助产士入学途径的学生,以及两个州的教育工作者/临床助产士。
191名助产专业学生和86名教育工作者/临床助产士做出了回应。总体而言,学生和教育工作者/临床助产士对临床评估工具持积极态度,超过90%的人报告称该工具涵盖了必要的助产技能。学生和教育工作者/临床助产士对学习工具的内容满意度很高。只有4%的教育工作者/临床助产士和6%的学生将临床评估工具总体评为差。为了反映近期的实践和证据,对一些学习工具进行修改是必要的。
一种用于评估助产专业学生临床实践的通用临床评估工具可能有助于对学生的技能和能力进行一致、可靠和客观的评估。