Galvin James E
Center for Cognitive Neurology, Departments of Neurology, Psychiatry, and Population Health, NYU Langone Medical Center.
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2015 Sep 1;1(3):316-324. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2015.05.004.
Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is a challenge to diagnose, particularly outside of expert centers with long delays in diagnosis leading to significant burden to patients and caregivers. While consensus criteria have excellent specificity, there is no standardized way to assess symptoms reducing sensitivity. We developed the Lewy Body Composite Risk Score (LBCRS) from autopsy-verified cases to improve the ability to detect DLB in clinic and research populations.
The LBCRS was tested in a consecutive series of 256 patients compared with the Clinical Dementia Rating and gold standard measures of cognition, motor symptoms, function, and behavior. Psychometric properties including floor and ceiling effects; concurrent, construct, and known-groups validity, and internal consistency of the LBCRS were determined. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves assessed the ability of LBCRS to differentiate: (a) DLB from Alzheimer's disease (AD); (b) DLB from all dementia, and (c) Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to DLB from MCI due to AD. The LBCRS was completed independent of the clinical evaluation.
Mean LBCRS scores were significantly different between DLB and AD (6.1±2.0 vs. 2.4±1.3, p<.001) and between MCI-DLB vs MCI-AD (3.2±0.9 vs. 1.0±0.8, p<.001). The LBCRS was able to discriminate DLB from other causes of dementia. Using a cut-off score of 3, areas under ROC for DLB vs. AD = 0.93 (0.89-0.98), and for MCI-DLB vs. MCI-AD = 0.96 (0.91-1.0).
The LBCRS increases diagnostic probability that Lewy body pathology is contributing to the dementia syndrome and should improve clinical detection and enrollment for clinical trials.
路易体痴呆(DLB)的诊断颇具挑战,尤其是在专家中心之外,诊断往往会延迟很久,给患者和照料者带来巨大负担。虽然共识标准具有出色的特异性,但目前尚无标准化方法来评估症状,这降低了诊断的敏感性。我们基于尸检确诊的病例开发了路易体综合风险评分(LBCRS),以提高在临床和研究人群中检测DLB的能力。
对连续的256例患者进行了LBCRS测试,并与临床痴呆评定量表以及认知、运动症状、功能和行为的金标准测量方法进行比较。确定了LBCRS的心理测量特性,包括地板效应和天花板效应;同时效度、结构效度、已知组效度以及内部一致性。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估LBCRS区分以下情况的能力:(a)DLB与阿尔茨海默病(AD);(b)DLB与所有痴呆症;(c)由DLB导致的轻度认知障碍(MCI)与由AD导致的MCI。LBCRS的完成独立于临床评估。
DLB与AD之间(6.1±2.0对2.4±1.3,p<0.001)以及MCI-DLB与MCI-AD之间(3.2±0.9对1.0±0.8,p<0.001)的LBCRS平均得分存在显著差异。LBCRS能够将DLB与其他痴呆病因区分开来。使用截断分数3时,DLB与AD的ROC曲线下面积为0.93(0.89 - 0.98),MCI-DLB与MCI-AD的ROC曲线下面积为0.96(0.91 - 1.0)。
LBCRS提高了路易体病理导致痴呆综合征的诊断概率,应能改善临床试验的临床检测和入组情况。