Votsi Nefta-Eleftheria P, Zomeni Maria S, Pantis J D
Department of Ecology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Environmental Conservation and Management Programme, School of Pure and Applied Sciences, Open University of Cyprus, Giannou Kranidioti 33, 1st Floor, Latsia, 2220, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Environ Manage. 2016 Feb;57(2):257-70. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0621-y. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
The wolf (Canis lupus) is used as a case study to rate Natura 2000 sites in Greece based on preferred wolf habitat characteristics and test whether the network is suitable for their conservation. Road density, agricultural area, site area, connectivity, food availability (i.e., presence of natural prey), and elevation in 237 sites are combined in a logistic regression model. The occurrence of the wolf's natural prey was the most prevalent factor determining wolf presence, followed by agricultural cover. Considering the current status of these features at N2K site level, most sites currently hosting wolves (85.7%) have good or excellent prospects for the long-term presence of the wolf. On the contrary, 11 sites which now have wolves are predicted to be ineffective in keeping them in the future due to the absence of wild ungulates and their high agricultural coverage. Four sites with no wolf presence currently have excellent prospects to host wolves in the future. Roadless sites are a priority for protection and retaining their current condition is strongly suggested. The proposed approach aims to detect gaps in protection for the wolf and identify priority sites in need of mitigation actions. It can also assist the assessment of conservation policies in Greece and elsewhere toward accomplishing set goals in protected areas. By focusing on wolf protection, we hope to increase agencies' attention to deal with conservation effectiveness, especially in cases like Greece, where a number of sites are insufficiently known and protected and management measures are not properly implemented.
以狼(Canis lupus)作为案例研究,根据狼偏好的栖息地特征对希腊的2000自然网络保护区进行评级,并测试该网络是否适合狼的保护。将237个保护区的道路密度、农业面积、保护区面积、连通性、食物可获得性(即天然猎物的存在情况)以及海拔纳入逻辑回归模型。狼的天然猎物的存在是决定狼是否出现的最主要因素,其次是农业覆盖情况。考虑到2000自然网络保护区层面这些特征的现状,目前有狼生存的大多数保护区(85.7%)在狼的长期生存方面具有良好或极佳的前景。相反,由于缺乏野生有蹄类动物且农业覆盖度高,目前有狼生存的11个保护区预计未来无法有效留住狼。目前没有狼生存的4个保护区未来极有可能有狼生存。无道路的保护区是保护的重点,强烈建议保持其当前状态。所提出的方法旨在发现狼保护方面的差距,并确定需要采取缓解行动的优先保护区。它还可以协助评估希腊及其他地区为实现保护区既定目标而制定的保护政策。通过专注于狼的保护,我们希望提高各机构对保护成效的关注,尤其是在像希腊这样的情况下,许多保护区了解不足且保护不力,管理措施也未得到妥善实施。