Tanaka J I
Shikwa Gakuho. 1989 Aug;89(8):1385-405.
Subject material for this study was pus collected from patients with purulent inflammation in the oro-maxillary region. Direct gas-liquid chromatography (GLC) analysis was made, bacterial isolation and identification were carried out, and comparisons were made with results from GLC analysis and anaerobic isolates in a PYG medium. In addition, antibiotic susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria were examined. Results 1. Anaerobic bacteria were isolated from 85 of 100 cases of obstructive abscesses. Of the 85, 49 were cases of mixed infection involving both anaerobic and aerobic bacteria; and 64 cases were involved with more than 2 species of anaerobic bacteria. Of the 184 strains of anaerobic isolates, 53 were Bacteroides sp. and 51 were Peptostreptococcus sp. The 2 groups accounted for more than half of the isolates. 2. Group A, in which no VFA was detected, accounted for 17 out of 100 cases. Group B, in which acetic acid was detected, accounted for 20 cases; and Group C, in which butyric acid was detected, accounted for 20 cases; and Group D, in which iso-valeric acid was detected, accounted for 8 cases. Direct GLC analysis revealed iso-caproic and caproic acids in the 35 cases constituting Group E. 3. Whereas the percentage of anaerobic bacteria was 64.7% in Group A and 60% in Group B, significantly higher percentages were noted in Group C (95%), Group D (100%) and Group E (100%). The following species were isolated as major member in the groups; Group A--Streptococcus intermedius, Group B--Peptostreptococcus micros, Group C--Fusobacterium nucleatum, Group D--Bacteroides gingivalis, and Group E--Peptostreptococcus anaerobius. 4. In all cases, the sum of VFA produced in the PYG medium by anaerobic isolates was classified into Group A' to E'. Ratios of agreement between VFA as revealed by direct GLC and VFA as revealed by PYG.GLC were as follows: Group A-A'; 47.1%, Group B-B' and C-C'; 45%, Group D-D'; 87.5%, and Group E-E'; 62.9%. 5. In Group B, no propionic acid was detected. The 2 cases in which acetic acid occurred in a concentration greater than 14 x 10(-4) meq/ml belonged to Group B'. In Group C, no isobutyric acid was detected; and the 5 cases in which butyric acid was detected in a concentration of more than 7 x 10(-4) meq/ml belonged to Group C'. Varelic acid was not detected in Group D; and 7 out of the 8 cases in which iso-valeric acid, irrespective of concentration, was detected belonged to Group D'.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
本研究的受试材料是从上颌面部区域脓性炎症患者身上采集的脓液。进行了直接气-液色谱(GLC)分析,开展了细菌分离与鉴定,并将结果与在PYG培养基中的GLC分析及厌氧菌分离株的结果进行了比较。此外,还检测了厌氧菌的抗生素敏感性。结果:1. 100例阻塞性脓肿患者中有85例分离出厌氧菌。在这85例中,49例为厌氧菌与需氧菌混合感染;64例涉及两种以上厌氧菌。在184株厌氧菌分离株中,53株为拟杆菌属,51株为消化链球菌属。这两组占分离株的一半以上。2. 100例中有17例属于A组,该组未检测到挥发性脂肪酸(VFA)。检测到乙酸的B组有20例;检测到丁酸的C组有20例;检测到异戊酸的D组有8例。直接GLC分析显示,构成E组的35例中存在异己酸和己酸。3. A组厌氧菌比例为64.7%,B组为60%,而C组(95%)、D组(100%)和E组(100%)的比例明显更高。以下菌种为各组的主要分离菌种:A组——中间型链球菌,B组——微小消化链球菌,C组——具核梭杆菌,D组——牙龈拟杆菌,E组——厌氧消化链球菌。4. 在所有病例中,厌氧菌分离株在PYG培养基中产生的VFA总和分为A'至E'组。直接GLC显示的VFA与PYG - GLC显示的VFA的一致率如下:A - A'组为47.1%,B - B'组和C - C'组为45%,D - D'组为87.5%,E - E'组为62.9%。5. B组未检测到丙酸。乙酸浓度大于14×10⁻⁴ 毫当量/毫升的2例属于B'组。C组未检测到异丁酸;丁酸浓度大于7×10⁻⁴ 毫当量/毫升的5例属于C'组。D组未检测到戊酸;检测到异戊酸(无论浓度如何)的8例中有7例属于D'组。(摘要截选至400字)