Costa Alfredo, Antonaci Fabio, Ramusino Matteo Cotta, Nappi Giuseppe
National Institute of Neurology IRCCS C. Mondino Foundation, University of Pavia, via Mondino 2, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2015;13(3):304-23. doi: 10.2174/1570159x13666150309233556.
Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs) are a group of primary headaches including cluster headache (CH), paroxysmal hemicrania (PH) and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT). Another form, hemicrania continua (HC), is also included this group due to its clinical and pathophysiological similarities. CH is the most common of these syndromes, the others being infrequent in the general population. The pathophysiology of the TACs has been partly elucidated by a number of recent neuroimaging studies, which implicate brain regions associated with nociception (pain matrix). In addition, the hypothalamic activation observed in the course of TAC attacks and the observed efficacy of hypothalamic neurostimulation in CH patients suggest that the hypothalamus is another key structure. Hypothalamic activation may indeed be involved in attack initiation, but it may also lead to a condition of central facilitation underlying the recurrence of pain episodes. The TACs share many pathophysiological features, but are characterised by differences in attack duration and frequency, and to some extent treatment response. Although alternative strategies for the TACs, especially CH, are now emerging (such as neurostimulation techniques), this review focuses on the available pharmacological treatments complying with the most recent guidelines. We discuss the clinical efficacy and tolerability of the currently used drugs. Due to the low frequency of most TACs, few randomised controlled trials have been conducted. The therapies of choice in CH continue to be the triptans and oxygen for acute treatment, and verapamil and lithium for prevention, but promising results have recently been obtained with novel modes of administration of the triptans and other agents, and several other treatments are currently under study. Indomethacin is extremely effective in PH and HC, while antiepileptic drugs (especially lamotrigine) appear to be increasingly useful in SUNCT. We highlight the need for appropriate studies investigating treatments for these rare, but lifelong and disabling conditions.
三叉自主神经性头痛(TACs)是一组原发性头痛,包括丛集性头痛(CH)、发作性偏侧头痛(PH)和伴有结膜充血和流泪的短暂性单侧神经痛样头痛(SUNCT)。另一种类型,持续性偏侧头痛(HC),由于其临床和病理生理相似性也被纳入该组。CH是这些综合征中最常见的,其他类型在普通人群中较少见。最近的一些神经影像学研究部分阐明了TACs的病理生理学,这些研究涉及与伤害感受相关的脑区(疼痛矩阵)。此外,在TAC发作过程中观察到的下丘脑激活以及在CH患者中观察到的下丘脑神经刺激的疗效表明,下丘脑是另一个关键结构。下丘脑激活可能确实参与了发作的起始,但它也可能导致疼痛发作复发的中枢易化状态。TACs具有许多共同的病理生理特征,但在发作持续时间和频率以及某种程度上的治疗反应方面存在差异。尽管现在出现了针对TACs,尤其是CH的替代策略(如神经刺激技术),但本综述重点关注符合最新指南的现有药物治疗。我们讨论了目前使用药物的临床疗效和耐受性。由于大多数TACs发病率较低,很少进行随机对照试验。CH的急性治疗首选曲坦类药物和吸氧,预防则选用维拉帕米和锂盐,但最近曲坦类药物和其他药物的新型给药方式取得了有希望的结果,目前还有几种其他治疗方法正在研究中。吲哚美辛对PH和HC极为有效,而抗癫痫药物(尤其是拉莫三嗪)在SUNCT中似乎越来越有用。我们强调需要进行适当的研究来探究这些罕见但会伴随终身且使人致残的疾病的治疗方法。