Langsetmo L, Barr S I, Berger C, Kreiger N, Rahme E, Adachi J D, Papaioannou A, Kaiser S M, Prior J C, Hanley D A, Kovacs C S, Josse R G, Goltzman D
David Goltzman, Royal Victoria Hospital, CaMos, 687 Pine Ave W, Room E1.64, Montreal, QC H3A 1A1, Email:
J Nutr Health Aging. 2015 Oct;19(8):861-8. doi: 10.1007/s12603-015-0544-6.
High dietary protein has been hypothesized to cause lower bone mineral density (BMD) and greater fracture risk. Previous results are conflicting and few studies have assessed potential differences related to differing protein sources.
To determine associations between total protein intake, and protein intake by source (dairy, non-dairy animal, plant) with BMD, BMD change, and incident osteoporotic fracture.
DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective cohort study (Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study). Participants/Measures: Protein intake was assessed as percent of total energy intake (TEI) at Year 2 (1997-99) using a food frequency questionnaire (N=6510). Participants were contacted annually to ascertain incident fracture. Total hip and lumbar spine BMD was measured at baseline and Year 5. Analyses were stratified by group (men 25-49 y, men 50+ y, premenopausal women 25-49 y, and postmenopausal women 50+ y) and adjusted for major confounders. Fracture analyses were limited to those 50+ y.
Intakes of dairy protein (with adjustment for BMI) were positively associated with total hip BMD among men and women aged 50+ y, and in men aged 25-49. Among adults aged 50+ y, those with protein intakes of <12% TEI (women) and <11% TEI (men) had increased fracture risk compared to those with intakes of 15% TEI. Fracture risk did not significantly change as intake increased above 15% TEI, and was not significantly associated with protein source.
In contrast to hypothesized risk of high protein, we found that for adults 50+ y, low protein intake (below 15% TEI) may lead to increased fracture risk. Source of protein was a determinant of BMD, but not fracture risk.
有假设认为高膳食蛋白质会导致较低的骨矿物质密度(BMD)和更高的骨折风险。先前的结果相互矛盾,很少有研究评估与不同蛋白质来源相关的潜在差异。
确定总蛋白质摄入量以及按来源(乳制品、非乳制品动物蛋白、植物蛋白)划分的蛋白质摄入量与骨密度、骨密度变化和骨质疏松性骨折发生率之间的关联。
设计/背景:前瞻性队列研究(加拿大多中心骨质疏松研究)。参与者/测量指标:使用食物频率问卷在第2年(1997 - 1999年)将蛋白质摄入量评估为总能量摄入量(TEI)的百分比(N = 6510)。每年联系参与者以确定骨折发生率。在基线和第5年测量全髋和腰椎的骨密度。分析按组(25 - 49岁男性、50岁及以上男性、25 - 49岁绝经前女性和50岁及以上绝经后女性)分层,并对主要混杂因素进行调整。骨折分析仅限于50岁及以上人群。
在50岁及以上的男性和女性以及25 - 49岁的男性中,乳制品蛋白质摄入量(经体重指数调整)与全髋骨密度呈正相关。在50岁及以上的成年人中,蛋白质摄入量低于12% TEI(女性)和低于11% TEI(男性)的人群与摄入量为15% TEI的人群相比,骨折风险增加。当摄入量超过15% TEI时,骨折风险没有显著变化,且与蛋白质来源无显著关联。
与高蛋白假设风险相反,我们发现对于50岁及以上的成年人,低蛋白质摄入量(低于15% TEI)可能导致骨折风险增加。蛋白质来源是骨密度的一个决定因素,但不是骨折风险的决定因素。