Becker Mark W, Bello Nora M, Sundar Raghav P, Peltier Chad, Bix Laura
Michigan State University.
Kansas State University.
Food Policy. 2015 Oct 1;56:76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.08.001.
In two experiments, we tracked the allocation of attention while participants (n=125) viewed novel and commercial packages with varied FOP designs using a change detection methodology.
We found empirical evidence that FOP labels are attended more often, and earlier, than the currently mandated NFP, and that this benefit is due both to its placement on the front of the package and to the design characteristics of the FOP. Specifically, the use of color in FOPs increased attention to the label, but there was no evidence that coding information via facial icons impacted attention.
Our work supports a growing body of evidence supporting the use of FOP labels to attract attention to nutritional information. Findings may be relevant to inform policy decisions on labeling standards.
1)评估包装正面(FOP)营养标签是否比更完整的法定营养信息(美国要求的营养成分表(NFP))更容易获得关注;2)确定标签设计特征,特别是颜色编码和/或面部图标编码,是否能提高对FOP标签的关注度。
在两项实验中,我们使用变化检测方法,在参与者(n = 125)查看具有不同FOP设计的新颖包装和商业包装时,跟踪他们的注意力分配情况。
我们发现实证证据表明,FOP标签比当前法定的NFP更常被关注,且更早被关注,这种优势既归因于其在包装正面的位置,也归因于FOP的设计特征。具体而言,FOP中颜色的使用增加了对标签的关注,但没有证据表明通过面部图标编码信息会影响注意力。
我们的研究支持了越来越多的证据,这些证据支持使用FOP标签来吸引对营养信息的关注。研究结果可能与为标签标准的政策决策提供信息相关。