DellaPosta Daniel, Shi Yongren, Macy Michael
AJS. 2015 Mar;120(5):1473-511. doi: 10.1086/681254.
Popular accounts of "lifestyle politics" and "culture wars" suggest that political and ideological divisions extend also to leisure activities, consumption, aesthetic taste, and personal morality. Drawing on a total of 22,572 pairwise correlations from the General Social Survey (1972-2010), the authors provide comprehensive empirical support for the anecdotal accounts. Moreover, most ideological differences in lifestyle cannot be explained by demographic covariates alone. The authors propose a surprisingly simplesolution to the puzzle of lifestyle politics. Computational experiments show how the self-reinforcing dynamics of homophily and influence dramatically amplify even very small elective affinities between lifestyle and ideology, producing a stereotypical world of "latte liberals" and "bird-hunting conservatives" much like the one in which we live.
关于“生活方式政治”和“文化战争”的通俗描述表明,政治和意识形态分歧也延伸到休闲活动、消费、审美品味和个人道德领域。作者利用综合社会调查(1972 - 2010年)中的22572个成对相关性数据,为这些轶事性描述提供了全面的实证支持。此外,生活方式方面的大多数意识形态差异不能仅由人口统计学协变量来解释。作者为生活方式政治难题提出了一个惊人的简单解决方案。计算实验表明,同质性和影响力的自我强化动态如何极大地放大了生活方式与意识形态之间即使非常小的选择性亲和性,从而产生了一个类似于我们生活其中的由“拿铁自由主义者”和“猎鸟保守派”组成的刻板世界。