Suppr超能文献

经口置入吻合器行体内食管空肠吻合术与体外圆形吻合术在腹腔镜胃癌全胃切除术中的短期疗效:倾向评分匹配分析

Short-term outcomes of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy using the transorally inserted anvil versus extracorporeal circular anastomosis during laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

作者信息

Lu Xin, Hu Yanfeng, Liu Hao, Mou Tingyu, Deng Zhenwei, Wang Da, Yu Jiang, Li Guoxin

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.

Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2016 Feb;200(2):435-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Aug 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To assess the short-term outcomes of intracorporeal Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil) compared with extracorporeal circular Roux-en-Y anastomosis during laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer.

METHODS

From January 2011-April 2014, a total of 165 consecutive patients with gastric cancer underwent either intracorporeal Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy (n = 25) using the Orvil or extracorporeal circular anastomosis (n = 140) during LTG. After generating propensity scores with six covariates, including gender, age, body mass index (BMI), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, tumor location, and tumor size, 25 patients undergoing the OrVil method (intracorporeal group) were one-to-one matched with 25 patients undergoing the extracorporeal method (extracorporeal group). The short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Both groups were balanced regarding baseline variables. The total operative time was not significantly different between the two groups (216.5 ± 24.9 min versus 224.0 ± 30.5 min, P = 0.344), whereas either the duration of anvil insertion (9.9 ± 2.4 min versus 12.9 ± 2.0 min, P < 0.001) or reconstruction completion (44.4 ± 9.4 min versus 50.1 ± 5.4 min, P = 0.012) in the intracorporeal group was less. The mean length of minilaparotomy in the intracorporeal group was shorter (5.6 ± 0.4 cm versus 7.2 ± 1.7 cm, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in intraoperative complication rate, estimated blood loss, length of proximal margin, or postoperative recovery course (including the time to first flatus, liquid resumption, liquid, and soft diet) between the two groups. No patients suffered from anastomosis-related complications. The overall morbidity rates of 28.0% in the intracorporeal group and 32.0% in the extracorporeal group were comparable (P = 0.758).

CONCLUSIONS

Intracorporeal Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy using the transorally inserted anvil system may be a safe procedure during LTG for gastric cancer. However, a longer follow-up in a well-designed randomized controlled trial is necessary to more thoroughly evaluate this technique.

摘要

背景

评估在腹腔镜全胃切除术(LTG)治疗胃癌过程中,使用经口置入吻合器(OrVil)进行体内Roux-en-Y食管空肠吻合术与体外圆形Roux-en-Y吻合术的短期疗效。

方法

2011年1月至2014年4月,共有165例连续性胃癌患者在LTG期间接受了体内Roux-en-Y食管空肠吻合术(n = 25),使用OrVil或体外圆形吻合术(n = 140)。在纳入包括性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态、肿瘤位置和肿瘤大小6个协变量生成倾向得分后,25例行OrVil法的患者(体内组)与25例行体外法的患者(体外组)进行一对一匹配。比较两组的短期疗效。

结果

两组在基线变量方面均衡。两组的总手术时间无显著差异(216.5±24.9分钟对224.0±30.5分钟,P = 0.344),而体内组的吻合器置入时间(9.9±2.4分钟对12.9±2.0分钟,P < 0.001)或重建完成时间(44.4±9.4分钟对50.1±5.4分钟,P = 0.012)更短。体内组小切口的平均长度更短(5.6±0.4厘米对7.2±1.7厘米,P < 0.001)。两组在术中并发症发生率、估计失血量、近端切缘长度或术后恢复过程(包括首次排气时间、恢复流食时间、流食和软食时间)方面未观察到显著差异。无患者发生吻合口相关并发症。体内组28.0%和体外组32.0%的总体发病率相当(P = 0.758)。

结论

在LTG治疗胃癌过程中,使用经口置入吻合器系统进行体内Roux-en-Y食管空肠吻合术可能是一种安全的手术方法。然而,需要在精心设计的随机对照试验中进行更长时间的随访,以更全面地评估该技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验