• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

起搏器远程监测患者的非正式护理工作量、时间及成本:PONIENTE研究

Workload, time and costs of the informal cares in patients with tele-monitoring of pacemakers: the PONIENTE study.

作者信息

López-Villegas Antonio, Catalán-Matamoros Daniel, Robles-Musso Emilio, Peiró Salvador

机构信息

Division of Medicine, Nordland Hospital, Prinsens Gate 164, Postbox 1480 (no. 38), 8005, Bodø, Norway.

Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Apr;105(4):307-13. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0921-5. Epub 2015 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00392-015-0921-5
PMID:26423396
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the burden borne by and the costs to informal caregivers of patients with remotely monitored (RM) pacemakers.

METHODS

The PONIENTE study was a controlled, non-randomised clinical trial, with data collected from informal caregivers, 12 months after implantation of pacemakers. The survey on disabilities, personal autonomy, and dependency situations was used to gather information on demographic and social characteristics, levels of professionalism, time and types of care, difficulties in providing care, health status, professional aspects, economic and family or leisure impacts due to informal caregiving for patients with pacemakers.

RESULTS

During 14 months, 76 caregivers were enrolled in the PONIENTE trial. Of which, 26 were included in the RM group and 50 in the hospital-monitored group (HM). The mean ages were 58.62 ± 16.51 and 61.10 ± 12.67 years, respectively (p = 0.56) in the groups, and 69.7 % were females. The majority (96.1 %) of the caregivers declared that they had to provide their services between 6 and 7 days per week (88.5 % in RM group versus 100 % in HM group; p = 0.037). The costs related to care provided by the informal caregivers were 21.38 % lower in the RM group than in the HM group (p = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

The PONIENTE study shows a significant impact of informal care on relatives and friends of patients with pacemakers in terms of their well-being and costs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02234245.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估远程监测(RM)起搏器患者的非正式照护者所承担的负担及成本。

方法

PONIENTE研究是一项对照、非随机临床试验,在起搏器植入12个月后从非正式照护者处收集数据。使用关于残疾、个人自主性和依赖状况的调查问卷来收集有关人口统计学和社会特征、专业水平、照护时间和类型、提供照护的困难、健康状况、专业方面、因照护起搏器患者产生的经济及家庭或休闲影响等信息。

结果

在14个月期间,76名照护者参与了PONIENTE试验。其中,26名纳入RM组,50名纳入医院监测组(HM)。两组的平均年龄分别为58.62±16.51岁和61.10±12.67岁(p = 0.56),女性占69.7%。大多数(96.1%)照护者表示他们每周需提供6至7天的照护服务(RM组为88.5%,HM组为100%;p = 0.037)。RM组中非正式照护者提供照护的相关成本比HM组低21.38%(p = 0.033)。

结论

PONIENTE研究表明,非正式照护对起搏器患者的亲属和朋友的幸福感及成本有重大影响。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02234245

相似文献

1
Workload, time and costs of the informal cares in patients with tele-monitoring of pacemakers: the PONIENTE study.起搏器远程监测患者的非正式护理工作量、时间及成本:PONIENTE研究
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Apr;105(4):307-13. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0921-5. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
2
Long-Term Socioeconomic Impact of Informal Care Provided to Patients with Pacemakers: Remote vs. Conventional Monitoring.为起搏器患者提供的非正式护理的长期社会经济影响:远程监测与传统监测
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Jun 16;8(2):175. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020175.
3
Effectiveness of pacemaker tele-monitoring on quality of life, functional capacity, event detection and workload: The PONIENTE trial.起搏器远程监测对生活质量、功能能力、事件检测及工作量的有效性:PONIENTE试验
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016 Nov;16(11):1188-1195. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12612. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
4
Cost-utility analysis on telemonitoring of users with pacemakers: The PONIENTE study.基于远程监测起搏器使用者的成本效用分析:PONIENTE 研究。
J Telemed Telecare. 2019 May;25(4):204-212. doi: 10.1177/1357633X18767184. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
5
The TECH@HOME study, a technological intervention to reduce caregiver burden for informal caregivers of people with dementia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.TECH@HOME研究:一项减轻痴呆症患者非正式照料者负担的技术干预措施——一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Feb 9;18(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1796-8.
6
Informal care of patients with schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者的非正式照料
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2013 Sep;16(3):99-108.
7
Remote follow-up of pacemakers in a selected population of debilitated elderly patients.对衰弱老年患者选定人群中起搏器的远程随访。
Europace. 2013 Mar;15(3):382-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus351. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
8
First outline and baseline data of a randomized, controlled multicenter trial to evaluate the health economic impact of home telemonitoring in chronic heart failure - CardioBBEAT.一项评估家庭远程监测对慢性心力衰竭健康经济影响的随机对照多中心试验——CardioBBEAT的初步概述和基线数据。
Trials. 2015 Aug 11;16:343. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0886-8.
9
Caregivers' burden in patients with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的照顾者负担
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Feb 12;10:347-56. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S76091. eCollection 2015.
10
Long-term cost-utility analysis of remote monitoring of older patients with pacemakers: the PONIENTE study.远程监测老年起搏器患者的长期成本-效用分析:PONIENTE 研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Nov 16;20(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01883-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic Evaluation of Remote Monitoring for Implantable Cardiac Devices: Evidence from a Remote-Care Study.植入式心脏设备远程监测的经济评估:来自一项远程护理研究的证据。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Sep 23;16:697-705. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S478089. eCollection 2024.
2
Remote Monitoring of CIEDs-For Both Safety, Economy and Convenience?远程监测 CIED—兼顾安全、经济与便捷?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 28;19(1):312. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010312.
3
A non-randomized clinical trial to examine patients' experiences and communication during telemonitoring of pacemakers after five years follow-up.

本文引用的文献

1
[Comparative Effectiveness of Remote Monitoring of People with Cardiac Pacemaker versus Conventional: quality of Life at the 6 Months].心脏起搏器患者远程监测与传统监测的比较效果:6个月时的生活质量
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2015 Apr;89(2):149-58. doi: 10.4321/S1135-57272015000200004.
2
Composite outcome measures in a pragmatic clinical trial of chronic heart failure management: A comparative assessment.慢性心力衰竭管理实用临床试验中的复合结局指标:一项比较评估
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Apr 15;185:62-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.071. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
3
Caregivers' burden in patients with COPD.
一项非随机临床试验,旨在检查起搏器远程监测五年后患者的体验和沟通情况。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 23;16(12):e0261158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261158. eCollection 2021.
4
Knowledge Update on the Economic Evaluation of Pacemaker Telemonitoring Systems.起搏器远程监测系统经济评估知识更新。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 18;18(22):12120. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212120.
5
Assessing Communication during Remote Follow-Up of Users with Pacemakers in Norway: The NORDLAND Study, a Randomized Trial.挪威起搏器远程随访中交流情况的评估:NORDLAND 研究,一项随机试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 21;17(20):7678. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207678.
6
Long-Term Socioeconomic Impact of Informal Care Provided to Patients with Pacemakers: Remote vs. Conventional Monitoring.为起搏器患者提供的非正式护理的长期社会经济影响:远程监测与传统监测
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Jun 16;8(2):175. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020175.
7
Cost-utility analysis of telemonitoring versus conventional hospital-based follow-up of patients with pacemakers. The NORDLAND randomized clinical trial.远程监测与传统基于医院的起搏器患者随访的成本效用分析。NORDLAND 随机临床试验。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 29;15(1):e0226188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226188. eCollection 2020.
8
Patients' experiences of remote communication after pacemaker implant: The NORDLAND study.患者在起搏器植入后的远程通讯体验:NORDLAND 研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 20;14(6):e0218521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218521. eCollection 2019.
9
Telemonitoring and Quality of Life in Patients after 12 Months Following a Pacemaker Implant: the Nordland Study, a Randomised Trial.心脏起搏器植入 12 个月后患者的远程监测与生活质量:一项随机试验——挪威北部研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 5;16(11):2001. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16112001.
10
Reliability and Validation of the Hexoskin Wearable Bio-Collection Device During Walking Conditions.Hexoskin可穿戴生物采集设备在行走状态下的可靠性与有效性验证
Int J Exerc Sci. 2018 Oct 1;11(7):806-816. doi: 10.70252/YPHF4748. eCollection 2018.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的照顾者负担
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Feb 12;10:347-56. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S76091. eCollection 2015.
4
Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a structured collaborative disease management in the Interdisciplinary Network for Heart Failure (INH) study.心力衰竭跨学科网络(INH)研究中结构化协作疾病管理的成本效益和成本效用。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Apr;104(4):304-9. doi: 10.1007/s00392-014-0781-4. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
5
Do current clinical trials meet society's needs?: a critical review of recent evidence.当前的临床试验是否满足社会需求?:对近期证据的批判性评价。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Oct 14;64(15):1615-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.08.008.
6
Socio-economic effects and cost saving potential of remote patient monitoring (SAVE-HM trial).远程患者监护的社会经济影响和成本节约潜力(SAVE-HM 试验)。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Nov 30;169(6):402-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.10.019.
7
Cost-utility analysis of the EVOLVO study on remote monitoring for heart failure patients with implantable defibrillators: randomized controlled trial.植入式除颤器心力衰竭患者远程监测的EVOLVO研究的成本效用分析:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2013 May 30;15(5):e106. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2587.
8
Effectiveness of remote monitoring of CIEDs in detection and treatment of clinical and device-related cardiovascular events in daily practice: the HomeGuide Registry.远程监测 CIED 在日常实践中检测和治疗临床及器械相关心血管事件的效果:HomeGuide 注册研究。
Europace. 2013 Jul;15(7):970-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus440. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
9
Telemedicine and cardiac implants: what is the benefit?远程医疗与心脏植入物:有何益处?
Eur Heart J. 2013 Jul;34(25):1885-95. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs388. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
10
Remote follow-up of pacemakers in a selected population of debilitated elderly patients.对衰弱老年患者选定人群中起搏器的远程随访。
Europace. 2013 Mar;15(3):382-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus351. Epub 2012 Nov 1.