Leal-Costa Cesar, Lopez-Villegas Antonio, Catalan-Matamoros Daniel, Robles-Musso Emilio, Lappegård Knut Tore, Bautista-Mesa Rafael Jesus, Peiró Salvador, Lopez-Liria Remedios
Nursing Department, University of Murcia, 30003 Murcia, Spain.
Social Involvement of Critical and Emergency Medicine, CTS-609 Research Group, Hospital de Poniente, 04700 El Ejido-Almería, Spain.
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Jun 16;8(2):175. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020175.
The impact of informal care immediately after pacemaker (PM) implantation has been well established; however, not much is known about its long-term effects. The present study compared personal characteristics, associated problems, workloads, time, and costs related to informal care provided to patients with PM under remote monitoring (RM) vs. conventional monitoring (CM) in the hospital, five years after implantation. The PONIENTE study was a controlled, non-randomized or masked clinical trial conducted with information obtained from the perspective of informal caregivers. Data were collected at 12 and 60 months after PM implantation. The patients in the study were assigned to two different groups: remote monitoring (RM) and conventional monitoring (CM). The "Disability, personal autonomy, and dependency situations survey" (EDAD) was administered to collect information on sociodemographic characteristics, time, care difficulties, health status, professional aspects, and impact on economic, family, or leisure aspects of the main caregivers providing care to patients with pacemakers. After five years, 55 patients completed the study (RM = 21; CM = 34). The average age was 63.14 years (SD = 14.90), 96% of them were women, and the most predominant marital status was married (72%). Informal caregivers lived in the homes of the patients in 70% of cases, and 88% indicated that they had to provide care six to seven days a week. The average cost per patient during the monitoring period studied was 13.17% lower in the RM group than in the CM group, and these differences were not statistically significant ( = 0.35). This study found similar results in the two groups under study with respect to sociodemographic characteristics, workload, time, and problems associated with health, leisure and family members. The costs associated with care were higher in the CM group; however, these differences were not statistically significant.
起搏器(PM)植入后即刻的非正式护理影响已得到充分证实;然而,其长期影响却知之甚少。本研究比较了植入起搏器五年后,在远程监测(RM)与医院常规监测(CM)模式下,为起搏器植入患者提供非正式护理的个人特征、相关问题、工作量、时间和成本。PONIENTE研究是一项对照、非随机或非盲法的临床试验,从非正式护理人员的角度获取信息。在PM植入后的12个月和60个月收集数据。研究中的患者被分为两个不同组:远程监测(RM)组和常规监测(CM)组。采用“残疾、个人自主性和依赖状况调查”(EDAD)收集主要护理起搏器患者的护理人员的社会人口学特征、时间、护理困难、健康状况、职业方面以及对经济、家庭或休闲方面影响的信息。五年后,55名患者完成了研究(RM组 = 21名;CM组 = 34名)。平均年龄为63.14岁(标准差 = 14.90),其中96%为女性,最主要的婚姻状况是已婚(72%)。70%的情况下,非正式护理人员住在患者家中,88%表示他们每周必须提供六到七天的护理。在研究的监测期内,RM组每位患者的平均成本比CM组低13.17%,但这些差异无统计学意义(P = 0.35)。本研究发现,在社会人口学特征、工作量、时间以及与健康、休闲和家庭成员相关的问题方面,两组研究结果相似。CM组的护理相关成本更高;然而,这些差异无统计学意义。