Yao Katharine, Goldschmidt Robert, Turk Mary, Wesseling Jelle, Stork-Sloots Lisette, de Snoo Femke, Cristofanilli Massimo
NorthShore University HealthSystem, 2650 Ridge Ave. Suite 1155, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.
Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Nov;154(1):81-8. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3587-9. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
Combined use of MammaPrint and a molecular subtyping profile (BluePrint) identifies disease subgroups with marked differences in long-term outcome and response to neo-adjuvant therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of molecular subtyping using MammaPrint and BluePrint in women with early-stage breast cancer (BC) treated at US institutions following National Comprehensive Cancer Network standard guidelines. Tumor samples were collected from stage 1-2B consecutively diagnosed BC patients (n = 373) who underwent lumpectomy or mastectomy with an axillary staging procedure between 1992 and 2010 at two institutes (NorthShore University HealthSystem and Fox Chase Cancer Center) in the United States of America, with a median follow-up time of 9.5 years. MammaPrint low-risk patients had a 10-year DMFS of 96 % (95 %CI 92.8-99.4), while MammaPrint high-risk patients had a 10-year DMFS of 87 % (95 %CI 81.9-92.1) with a hazard ratio of 3.62 (95 %CI 1.38-9.50) (p = 0.005). Uni- and multivariate analyses included age, tumor size, grade, ER, and Her2; in multivariate analysis, MammaPrint reached near-significance (HR 3.01; p 0.08). When comparing BluePrint molecular subtyping with clinical stratification, the prognosis (10-year DMFS) was significantly different in 10-year DMFS between the different molecular subtypes (p < 0.001). This retrospective study with 10-year follow-up data provides valuable insight into prognosis of patients with primary BC comparing clinical with molecular subtyping. The BluePrint molecular stratification assay identifies patients with significantly different outcomes compared with standard clinical molecular stratification.
MammaPrint与分子亚型分型谱(BluePrint)联合使用可识别出长期预后和对新辅助治疗反应存在显著差异的疾病亚组。本研究的目的是评估在美国机构按照美国国立综合癌症网络标准指南治疗的早期乳腺癌(BC)女性中,使用MammaPrint和BluePrint进行分子亚型分型的预后价值。肿瘤样本取自1992年至2010年期间在美国两家机构(北岸大学健康系统和福克斯蔡斯癌症中心)连续诊断为1-2B期BC且接受了保乳手术或乳房切除术及腋窝分期手术的患者(n = 373),中位随访时间为9.5年。MammaPrint低风险患者的10年远处转移无复发生存率(DMFS)为96%(95%CI 92.8 - 99.4),而MammaPrint高风险患者的10年DMFS为87%(95%CI 81.9 - 92.1),风险比为3.62(95%CI 1.38 - 9.50)(p = 0.005)。单因素和多因素分析包括年龄、肿瘤大小、分级、雌激素受体(ER)和人表皮生长因子受体2(Her2);在多因素分析中,MammaPrint接近显著水平(风险比3.01;p = 0.08)。当将BluePrint分子亚型分型与临床分层进行比较时,不同分子亚型之间的10年DMFS预后存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。这项具有10年随访数据的回顾性研究为比较原发性BC患者临床分型与分子分型的预后提供了有价值的见解。与标准临床分子分层相比,BluePrint分子分层分析可识别出预后显著不同的患者。