Stockinger Christian, Thürer Benjamin, Focke Anne, Stein Thorsten
Young Investigator Group "Computational Motor Control and Learning," BioMotion Center, Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
Young Investigator Group "Computational Motor Control and Learning," BioMotion Center, Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Dec;114(6):3166-76. doi: 10.1152/jn.00727.2015. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
Intermanual transfer, i.e., generalization of motor learning across hands, is a well-accepted phenomenon of motor learning. Yet, there are open questions regarding the characteristics of this transfer, particularly the intermanual transfer of dynamic learning. In this study, we investigated intermanual transfer in a force field adaptation task concerning the direction and the coordinate frame of transfer as well as the influence of a 24-h consolidation period on the transfer. We tested 48 healthy human subjects for transfer from dominant to nondominant hand, and vice versa. We considered two features of transfer. First, we examined transfer to the untrained hand using force channel trials that suppress error feedback and learning mechanisms to assess intermanual transfer in the form of a practice-dependent bias. Second, we considered transfer by exposing the subjects to the force field with the untrained hand to check for faster learning of the dynamics (interlimb savings). Half of the subjects were tested for transfer immediately after adaptation, whereas the other half were tested after a 24-h consolidation period. Our results showed intermanual transfer both from dominant to nondominant hand and vice versa in extrinsic coordinates. After the consolidation period, transfer effects were weakened. Moreover, the transfer effects were negligible compared with the subjects' ability to rapidly adapt to the force field condition. We conclude that intermanual transfer is a bidirectional phenomenon that vanishes with time. However, the ability to transfer motor learning seems to play a minor role compared with the rapid adaptation processes.
双手间迁移,即运动学习在双手间的泛化,是运动学习中一个被广泛接受的现象。然而,关于这种迁移的特征,尤其是动态学习的双手间迁移,仍存在一些未解决的问题。在本研究中,我们在一个力场适应任务中研究了双手间迁移,涉及迁移的方向、坐标框架以及24小时巩固期对迁移的影响。我们测试了48名健康人类受试者从优势手到非优势手的迁移,以及反之亦然的情况。我们考虑了迁移的两个特征。首先,我们使用抑制误差反馈和学习机制的力通道试验来检查向未训练手的迁移,以评估练习依赖性偏差形式的双手间迁移。其次,我们通过让受试者用未训练的手暴露于力场中来考虑迁移,以检查动力学的更快学习(肢体间节省)。一半的受试者在适应后立即进行迁移测试,而另一半在24小时巩固期后进行测试。我们的结果表明,在外在坐标中,双手间迁移既可以从优势手到非优势手,也可以反之亦然。在巩固期后,迁移效应减弱。此外,与受试者快速适应力场条件的能力相比,迁移效应可以忽略不计。我们得出结论,双手间迁移是一种双向现象,会随时间消失。然而,与快速适应过程相比,运动学习的迁移能力似乎起次要作用。