Gonçalves-Bradley Daniela C, Boylan Anne-Marie, Koshiaris Constantinos, Vazquez Montes Maria, Ford Gary A, Lasserson Daniel S
Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, New Radcliffe House, Walton Street, Oxford OX2 6GG.
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, New Radcliffe House, Walton Street, Oxford OX2 6GG.
Fam Pract. 2015 Dec;32(6):659-63. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv074. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
Clinical practice guidelines recommend that stroke survivors' needs be assessed at regular intervals after stroke. The extent to which GPs comply with national guidance particularly for patients in care homes who have greatest clinical complexity is unknown.
This study aimed to establish the current clinical practice in the UK of needs assessment by GPs for stroke survivors after hospital discharge for acute stroke.
Cross-sectional online survey of current practice of GPs, using the national doctors.net network.
The survey was completed by 300 GPs who had on average been working for 14 years. The structured assessment of stroke survivors' needs was not offered by 31% of GPs, with no significant difference for level of provision in community or care home settings. The outputs of reviews were added to patients' notes by 89% of GPs and used to change management by 57%. Only half the GPs reported integrating the information obtained into care plans and only a quarter of GPs had a protocol for follow-up of identified needs. Analysis of free-text comments indicated that patients in some care homes may receive more regular and structured reviews.
This survey suggests that at least one-third of GPs provide no formal review of the needs of stroke patients and that in only a minority are identified needs addressed in a structured way. Standardization is required for what is included in reviews and how needs are being identified and met.
临床实践指南建议,中风幸存者的需求应在中风后定期进行评估。全科医生(GP)在多大程度上遵守国家指南,尤其是对于临床复杂性最高的养老院患者,目前尚不清楚。
本研究旨在确定英国全科医生对急性中风出院后的中风幸存者进行需求评估的当前临床实践情况。
通过国家医生网络对全科医生的当前实践进行横断面在线调查。
300名平均工作了14年的全科医生完成了调查。31%的全科医生未对中风幸存者的需求进行结构化评估,在社区或养老院环境中的提供水平没有显著差异。89%的全科医生将评估结果添加到患者病历中,57%的全科医生将其用于改变管理方式。只有一半的全科医生报告将获得的信息纳入护理计划,只有四分之一的全科医生有针对已确定需求的随访方案。对自由文本评论的分析表明,一些养老院的患者可能会接受更定期和结构化的评估。
这项调查表明,至少三分之一的全科医生没有对中风患者的需求进行正式评估,只有少数全科医生以结构化方式处理已确定的需求。对于评估内容以及如何识别和满足需求,需要进行标准化。