Langley C, Faulkner A, Watkins C, Gray S, Harvey I
Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, UK.
Fam Pract. 1998 Apr;15(2):105-11. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.2.105.
Concern about the inadequate take-up of guidelines in general practice has concentrated on problems arising from the process of their development and implementation. However, these perspectives fail to take account of the needs, attitudes and problems of GPs themselves. In this study we aimed to identify barriers to the use of guidelines and opportunities for tackling them, from the point of view of the GP, so that future guideline development and policy could be more sensitive to the needs of GPs in the environment in which they work.
Twenty in-depth semi-structured interviews were audiotaped with GPs from within the Avon Health Authority area, representing GPs with different backgrounds and working environments. The transcribed data collected were analysed using a grounded theory approach.
Utilization of guideline information is complex. GPs' appraisals of the value of guidelines interact with prior knowledge and beliefs, practicalities of existing information storage and retrieval systems, and individual working practices. Conditions where guidelines are most likely to be referred to may be those either very rarely or very commonly presenting in general practice. Key issues for the uptake of guidelines in the consultation are: general preference for certain formats of presentation; reputability and ownership; use of guidelines in shared decision-making; scope for computer-based systems; and GPs' attitudes to time pressures on information-seeking in relation to tolerance of uncertainty.
Local initiatives might usefully explore the possibilities of supporting development of guideline-retrieval systems customized for individual GPs or practices. Novel means of stimulating 'ownership' and demonstrating reputability should be sought. The analysis provides a framework for understanding the complexities of the processes of GPs' use of guidelines in practice which can be useful in explaining the results of trials of guideline effectiveness. Guideline implementation occurs in the context of conflicting pressures for clinical autonomy and professional standardization and quality improvement.
对一般医疗实践中指南采纳不足的担忧主要集中在其制定和实施过程中出现的问题。然而,这些观点未能考虑到全科医生自身的需求、态度和问题。在本研究中,我们旨在从全科医生的角度识别指南使用的障碍以及解决这些障碍的机会,以便未来的指南制定和政策能够更敏锐地适应全科医生工作环境中的需求。
对来自埃文卫生局辖区内的全科医生进行了20次深入的半结构化访谈,并进行了录音,这些全科医生代表了不同背景和工作环境的全科医生。使用扎根理论方法对收集到的转录数据进行分析。
指南信息的利用很复杂。全科医生对指南价值的评估与先验知识和信念、现有信息存储与检索系统的实用性以及个人工作实践相互作用。最有可能参考指南的情况可能是那些在一般医疗实践中很少出现或非常常见的情况。在咨询中采纳指南的关键问题包括:对某些呈现形式的普遍偏好;声誉和所有权;在共同决策中使用指南;基于计算机系统的应用范围;以及全科医生在寻求信息时对时间压力与不确定性容忍度的态度。
地方举措可能会有益地探索支持为个体全科医生或诊所定制指南检索系统发展的可能性。应寻求激发“所有权”和展示声誉的新方法。该分析提供了一个框架,用于理解全科医生在实践中使用指南过程的复杂性,这有助于解释指南有效性试验的结果。指南的实施是在临床自主性与专业标准化及质量改进的相互冲突的压力背景下进行的。