Bhakhri Bhanu Kiran, Rana Sheeba, Goyal Jagdish P
Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Sep-Oct;19(5):630-2. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.163182.
With distinct geographical and demographic conditions prevalent in the regions of Himalayan foothills, it seems questionable to assess the children from these areas using the standards based upon growth pattern of children from major central cities of the country. To answer this question, we compared the growth parameters of apparently healthy children, attending our out-patient clinic, with corresponding median values for age from national reference data.
The growth parameters of apparently healthy children were compared with the expected value for age that is, median value for the corresponding age from the recommended national reference data (Agarwal et al).
Data from 205 boys and 200 girls, aged 5-18 years, were finally evaluated. The considerable difference was observed between growth parameters. Children from Uttarakhand were observed to be lighter, especially in older age groups and taller, especially in younger age groups, when compared with corresponding median values from reference data.
It appears inappropriate to interpret the growth parameters of the children of this region in the background of index national reference.
鉴于喜马拉雅山麓地区存在独特的地理和人口状况,采用基于该国主要中心城市儿童生长模式的标准来评估这些地区的儿童似乎存在问题。为回答这一问题,我们将在我们门诊就诊的明显健康儿童的生长参数与来自国家参考数据的相应年龄中位数进行了比较。
将明显健康儿童的生长参数与预期年龄值进行比较,即来自推荐的国家参考数据(阿加瓦尔等人)中相应年龄的中位数。
最终评估了205名年龄在5至18岁之间的男孩和200名女孩的数据。观察到生长参数之间存在显著差异。与参考数据中的相应中位数相比,发现北阿坎德邦的儿童体重较轻,尤其是在年龄较大的组中,身高较高,尤其是在年龄较小的组中。
在国家参考指数的背景下解释该地区儿童的生长参数似乎不合适。