Medikeri Raghavendra Shrishail, Pereira Marisca Austin, Waingade Manjushri, Navale Shwetambari
Department of Periodontology, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, India.
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, India.
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2022 Aug;52(4):261-281. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2007340367.
Short implants are a potential alternative to long implants for use with bone augmentation in atrophic jaws. This meta-analysis investigated the survival rate and marginal bone level (MBL) of surface-modified short vs. long implants.
Electronic and manual searches were performed for articles published between January 2010 and June 2021. Twenty-two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surface-modified short and long implants that reported the survival rate with at least 1 year of follow-up were selected. Two reviewers independently extracted the data, and the risk of bias and quality of evidence were evaluated. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed regarding survival rate and MBL.
The failure rates of surface-modified short and long implants differed significantly (risk ratio, 2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46, 3.57; 0.000). Long implants exhibited a higher survival rate than short implants (mean follow-up, 1-10 years). A significant difference was observed in mean MBL (mean difference=-0.43, 95% CI, -0.63, -0.23; <0.000), favoring the short implants. Regarding the impact of surface treatment in short and long implants, for hydrophilic sandblasted acid-etched (=0.020) and titanium oxide fluoride-modified (=0.050) surfaces, the survival rate differed significantly between short and long implants. The MBL differences for novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated, hydrophilic sandblasted acid-etched, and dual acid-etched with nanometer-scale calcium phosphate crystal surfaces (=0.050, =0.020, and <0.000, respectively) differed significantly for short vs. long implants.
Short surface-modified implants are a potential alternative to longer implants in atrophic ridges. Long fluoride-modified and hydrophilic sandblasted acid-etched implants have higher survival rates than short implants. Short implants with novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surfaces, hydrophilic sandblasted acid-etched surfaces, and dual acid-etched surfaces with nanometer-scale calcium phosphate crystals showed less marginal bone loss than longer implants. Due to high heterogeneity, the MBL results should be interpreted cautiously, and better-designed RCTs should be assessed in the future.
International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) Identifier: CRD42020160185.
对于萎缩性颌骨行骨增量术时,短种植体是长种植体的一种潜在替代方案。本荟萃分析研究了表面改性短种植体与长种植体的生存率和边缘骨水平(MBL)。
对2010年1月至2021年6月发表的文章进行电子检索和手工检索。选择了22项比较表面改性短种植体和长种植体的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验报告了至少1年随访期的生存率。两名研究者独立提取数据,并评估偏倚风险和证据质量。对生存率和MBL进行定量荟萃分析。
表面改性短种植体和长种植体的失败率有显著差异(风险比,2.28;95%置信区间[CI],1.46,3.57;P=0.000)。长种植体的生存率高于短种植体(平均随访时间为1至10年)。在平均MBL方面观察到显著差异(平均差=-0.43,95%CI,-0.63,-0.23;P<0.000),短种植体更具优势。关于表面处理对短种植体和长种植体的影响,对于亲水性喷砂酸蚀表面(P=0.020)和氟化物改性氧化钛表面(P=0.050),短种植体和长种植体的生存率有显著差异。对于新型纳米结构含钙、亲水性喷砂酸蚀以及具有纳米级磷酸钙晶体表面的双重酸蚀表面(分别为P=0.050、P=0.020和P<0.000),短种植体和长种植体的MBL差异显著。
表面改性短种植体是萎缩性牙槽嵴中长种植体的一种潜在替代方案。长氟化物改性和亲水性喷砂酸蚀种植体的生存率高于短种植体。具有新型纳米结构含钛表面、亲水性喷砂酸蚀表面以及具有纳米级磷酸钙晶体的双重酸蚀表面的短种植体比长种植体显示出更少的边缘骨吸收。由于异质性高,MBL结果应谨慎解释,未来应评估设计更好的RCT。
国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)标识符:CRD42020160185。