Chang Donald D, Colecraft Henry M
Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
J Physiol. 2015 Dec 1;593(23):5075-90. doi: 10.1113/JP270889.
Rad and Rem are Ras-like G-proteins linked to diverse cardiovascular functions and pathophysiology. Understanding how Rad and Rem are regulated is important for deepened insights into their pathophysiological roles. As in other Ras-like G-proteins, Rad and Rem contain a conserved guanine-nucleotide binding domain (G-domain). Canonically, G-domains are key control modules, functioning as nucleotide-regulated switches of G-protein activity. Whether Rad and Rem G-domains conform to this canonical paradigm is ambiguous. Here, we used multiple functional measurements in HEK293 cells and cardiomyocytes (Ca(V)1.2 currents, Ca(2+) transients, Ca(V)β binding) as biosensors to probe the role of the G-domain in regulation of Rad and Rem function. We utilized Rad(S105N) and Rem(T94N), which are the cognate mutants to Ras(S17N), a dominant-negative variant of Ras that displays decreased nucleotide binding affinity. In HEK293 cells, over-expression of either Rad(S105N) or Rem(T94N) strongly inhibited reconstituted Ca(V)1.2 currents to the same extent as their wild-type (wt) counterparts, contrasting with reports that Rad(S105N) is functionally inert in HEK293 cells. Adenovirus-mediated expression of either wt Rad or Rad(S105N) in cardiomyocytes dramatically blocked L-type calcium current (I(Ca,L)) and inhibited Ca(2+)-induced Ca(2+) release, contradicting reports that Rad(S105N) acts as a dominant negative in heart. By contrast, Rem(T94N) was significantly less effective than wt Rem at inhibiting I(Ca,L) and Ca(2+) transients in cardiomyocytes. FRET analyses in cardiomyocytes revealed that both Rad(S105N) and Rem(T94N) had moderately reduced binding affinity for Ca(V)βs relative to their wt counterparts. The results indicate Rad and Rem are non-canonical G-proteins with respect to the regulatory role of their G-domain in Ca(V)1.2 regulation.
Rad和Rem是与多种心血管功能及病理生理学相关的类Ras G蛋白。了解Rad和Rem如何被调控对于深入洞察它们的病理生理作用至关重要。与其他类Ras G蛋白一样,Rad和Rem含有一个保守的鸟嘌呤核苷酸结合结构域(G结构域)。通常,G结构域是关键的控制模块,作为G蛋白活性的核苷酸调节开关发挥作用。Rad和Rem的G结构域是否符合这一经典模式尚不清楚。在此,我们在HEK293细胞和心肌细胞中进行了多种功能测量(Ca(V)1.2电流、Ca(2+)瞬变、Ca(V)β结合)作为生物传感器,以探究G结构域在调节Rad和Rem功能中的作用。我们使用了Rad(S105N)和Rem(T94N),它们是Ras(S17N)的同源突变体,Ras(S17N)是Ras的一种显性负变体,其核苷酸结合亲和力降低。在HEK293细胞中,Rad(S105N)或Rem(T94N)的过表达与它们的野生型(wt)对应物一样强烈地抑制重组Ca(V)1.2电流,这与关于Rad(S105N)在HEK293细胞中功能惰性的报道形成对比。腺病毒介导的wt Rad或Rad(S105N)在心肌细胞中的表达显著阻断L型钙电流(I(Ca,L))并抑制Ca(2+)诱导的Ca(2+)释放,这与关于Rad(S)105N)在心脏中作为显性负性起作用的报道相矛盾。相比之下,Rem(T94N)在抑制心肌细胞中的I(Ca,L)和Ca(2+)瞬变方面比wt Rem的效果明显要差。心肌细胞中的FRET分析表明,相对于它们的wt对应物,Rad(S105N)和Rem(T94N)对Ca(V)β的结合亲和力均有适度降低。结果表明,就其G结构域在Ca(V)1.2调节中的调控作用而言,Rad和Rem是非经典G蛋白。